返回列表 发帖

[讨论]请教一道逻辑题

A drug that is highly effective in treating many types of infection can, at present, be obtained only from the bark of the ibora, a tree that is quite rare in the wild. It takes the bark of 5,000 trees to make one kilogram of the drug. It follows, therefore, that continued production of the drug must inevitably lead to the ibora’s extinction.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

(A) The drug made from ibora bark is dispensed to doctors from a central authority.

(B) The drug made from ibora bark is expensive to produce.

(C) The leaves of the ibora are used in a number of medical products.

(D) The ibora can be propagated from cuttings and grown under cultivation.E

(E) The ibora generally grows in largely inaccessible places.


D和E我觉得都成,一个说多种,一个说砍不到.......
收藏 分享

S                   N 

Continued production----->Extinction

A->B要削弱,应该A--->~B,(D)即A-->~B,而(E)实则~A-->~B

所以选D不选E 

TOP

E不对!E是反对前提.

E说生长在无法接近的地方就是再说没法进行continued production of the drug .

削弱的时候是要承认前提反对结论(feifei的话),所以你这个不对!

TOP

用楼上的话说,就是~A-->~B并不对A->B这个推理的合理性构成威胁.

TOP

多谢!!!!!

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看