返回列表 发帖

请问:Prep1-93

Because it was long thought that few people would watch lengthy televised political messages, most televised political advertisements, like commercial advertisements, took the form of short messages.  Last year, however, one candidate produced a half-hour-long advertisement.  At the beginning of the half-hour slot a substantial portion of the viewing public had tuned in to that station.  Clearly, then, many more people are interested in lengthy televised political messages than was previously thought.

 

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

 

A. The candidate who produced the half-hour-long advertisement did not win election at the polls.

 

B. The half-hour-long advertisement was widely publicized before it was broadcast.

 

C. The half-hour-long advertisement was aired during a time slot normally taken by one of the most popular prime-time shows.

 

D. Most short political advertisements are aired during a wide range of programs in order to reach a broad spectrum of viewers.

 

E. In general a regular-length television program that features debate about current political issues depends for its appeal on the personal qualities of the program's moderator.


我觉得B和C都对啊?

B:因为advertisement,而不是interests的改变,使得收视率增加;和C都是他因削弱啊?


thanks

收藏 分享

原题中没有说之前short messages没有被widely publicized啊

TOP

之前广告被广泛公开  能作为  在电视上一放大家就都看它  的解释么?   它是

无关。

一种情况,公开了,大家也很烦它, 另一种情况,公开了,大家发现它不错。  各

占50%

你没有看成 WIDLY POPULARIZED把?

TOP

哈哈 楼上2位说的都很有道理。。啊 明白了 嘻嘻谢谢

TOP

这题选C吗? gwd21-38题干是这个,可题型和选项都不同啊  prep破解上也没找到此题

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看