太大意了，只手忙脚乱地准备了俩星期，把OG的SC和RC做了两三遍，我的神啊，verbal看来没啥提高……
700分，数学50，verbal33，rank93%,不知道这个分数是个啥概念，也不知道能用来申啥样的学校（鄙视我吧……），在全站搜也没搜到……麻烦知道的人告诉一声吧，谢了：）
心得体会：1。数学机经一定要好好看，碰到的题有一半都是机经上的，很多题没有见过的话比较头大，看过的话很多题都是秒杀，后来俺做完最后一道数学题对着屏幕傻笑了十几分钟，嘿嘿，比较猪啦
2。考前要模考才好，俺就开始准备gmat前模考了一次，结果傻傻的没掌握好pace，前面题做的快而且差，verbal提前８分钟交卷，哭ing……
考试的适应问题：
1。办护照的时候别跟人说要考试了，多费唇舌也讲不明白，就说要出去访友啥的就成了。
2。可以带个水杯去那里现场接点热水喝，俺早上吃了点凉的，中间喝了凉咖啡，考完出来狂吐。
3。周一考的人要考虑时间的提前量，北京周一上午和周五下午一般会堵车。
4。睡的好不好应该问题不大，俺神经质的只睡了三个小时，到考场上就比较清醒了……
5。 俺走的时候还顺走了一副防噪音耳塞，呼呼，然后去白石桥家乐福超市逛了一把：）
机经：
作文：argu：105，eliminate the curriculum的问题
issue，36，strong individuals get things done 的那题，都看过，写的还比较顺，把模版也粘上来吧，见下：）
数学，着实很多是机经上的，嗯，记性很差的，想想……
1。y=3-x^2, 和y=x+2,问交点在哪个象限，最后那个对着它傻笑了半天的题，细细。
2。知道有70%（不确定是不是这个数）的人订了咖啡，问可否算出定点心的人占总人数的概率，定两个条件：１．定咖啡的人中有６０％人定了点心２。定点心的人中有９０％定了咖啡
３。个人认为比较ｔｒｉｃｋｙ的一题：２８０个人有１１２人预定，问预定的人数的数字比不预定的人数的数字大百分之几？注意，问的是数字大百分之几，并非占总人数的百分之几。所以是（２８０－１１２＊２）／１１２得５０％
４。三角形面积公式：根号下ｓ（ｓ－ａ）（ｓ－ｂ）（ｓ－ｃ），ａ，ｂ，ｃ是边长，ｓ是周长的一半，已知ａ，ｂ，ｃ得２，３，４，问面积，答案有１．５，４．５啥的，算算就好，不难。
５。扔骰子，两个数之和为７的概率，嘿嘿，机经上有，１／６
６。三种机器，Ａ装瓶４００立方厘米每分（数字没有太大关系啦），Ｂ装瓶６００立方厘米每分，Ｃ加瓶盖１２００个每分钟，问ＡＢＣ各有几个１。已知有２４００个瓶子被装上每分钟。每分钟ｗｏｒｋ的Ｂ和Ｃ的比例是２：１，俺选的Ｃ
ｖｅｒｂａｌ真，真，真记不住了，ｓｏｒｒｙ……
神啊，如果让我再来一次，我一定选择：模考！！！８过决定不考这种摧残人的考试了……
模版：
Issue
This statement actually consists of two claims:
问句开头？Different people may hold different opinions to this issue due to their varying educational background and emotional preference for ethical principles. The speaker claims so, for the reason that_ , As for me, I agree with the speaker insofar as that _, while I concede that_. Beyond this concession, however, I find the contension indefensible both from an empirical and a normative standpoint.
Or : Nevertheless, despite the merits of the speaker’s claim, I find the claim problematic in several crucial respects.
Taking the above considerations into account, I feel quite comfortable to arrive at the conclusion that ___
Argument,开头：In this argument, the arguer tries to prove that^. To illustrate/justify this claim, the arguer provides evidence that^and that^. Nevertheless, despite the merits of the speaker’s claim, a careful examination of the argument will reveal how groundless the conclusion is/how incomplete the logic of the argument is/I find it problematic in several crucial respects. –the argument suffers from several crucial fallacies.
结尾：To sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains. To strengthen the argument, it is necessary for the arguer to provide more evidence about all the above-mentioned factors/rule out the possibilities before we could better evaluate the argument. In summary, the argument is not persuasive as it stands. To strengthen the argument, the arguer would have to provide more information about ^ and so on.Additionally, he should also make sure that. As it stands, the reasoning does not constitute a quite convincing and logical argument in favor of the recommendation.
Sentence patterns: the argument fails to consider and rule out other factors/possibility that might count for_, the fact that_ lends no support to the conclusion that_
The author provides no evidence that_.
DATA: The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who conducted the poll, who responded, or when, where and how the poll was conducted. Lacking such information, it is impossible to access the validity of the results.From the survey quoted in the argument, however, we find no sign of such procedures for random sampling, and have good reasons to doubt if the sample is representative enough to reflect the general attitudes of all workers as a whole. Lacking more specific information about how_, it is impossible to access the reliability of the survey’s results or to make an informed recommendation. Therefore, any decision aimed at addressing the problem of _ must be based on more thorough investigation to gather sufficient data in order to narrow down and locate the actual causes of the problem.
The arguer generalizes from what is true in one region of space to what must be true in all regions of space. The arguer use a few exceptional cases as the basis for a claim about what is true in general. The comparison in the argument is selective and incomplete. The arguer commits a fallacy of hasty generalization.
The arguer’s conclusion depends on the questionable assumption that _.
Necessary: Common sense tells me that there are a lot of other ways in which A, such as B, C, D, E, to list just a few. (Perhaps one of these would be just as effective as, or even more effective than, the A, the proposed plan.)
False analogy: The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects. However, this assumption is weak, since it is highly doubtful that all elements drawn from A are applicable to B. For example, X, Y, Z all affect A, but are virtually in absent in B. Differences between the two clearly outweigh the similarities, thus making the analogy highly less than valid.
The author assumes that AA and BB are mutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground. Yet the author presented no evidence that supports this either-or choice. Common sense tells us that Implementation of both A and B may produce better results. Without taking these into account and without ruling out these alternatives, the author oversimplifies the solution and cannot persuade me to accept his claim. | 
