返回列表 发帖

[求助]GWD-12-Q29: 逻辑题求解

The Earth’s rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  Clearly, therefore, by taking the resulting increase in salt levels in the oceans over the past hundred years and then determining how many centuries of such increases it would have taken the oceans to reach current salt levels from a hypothetical initial salt-free state, the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans can be accurately estimated.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.
B. At any given time, all the Earth’s rivers have about the same salt levels.
C. There are salts that leach into the Earth’s oceans directly from the ocean floor.
D. There is no method superior to that based on salt levels for estimating the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans.
E. None of the salts carried into the Earth’s oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.

Answer:  A

这题为什么选A呢?
我选D,因为有依据salt level估测oceans的最大年龄是最好的方法的假设,作者才能说用这个方法能精确地测量ocean的年龄啊
收藏 分享

愚见

A NOT 之后就WEAKEN了

A说在过去的几年沉淀的盐并没特别的多。  进而和题目第一句吻合,constantly carry.....

而且也就是因为它constantly carry才能拿来测量, 如果不是的话。能拿来测量吗?

所以说。 如果取非A, 说明不constantly carry。 那还怎么estimate??

再看D, 你觉得还是选D吗?

TOP

我再来加几句,为什么不是D。有更好的方法来测定年龄,不代表句子中所说的方法不能准确测定,既然如此,没有更好的方法就不必是一个前提条件。

TOP

A选项是多么经典的一道取非削弱呀~~~

望楼主警戒哦

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看