返回列表 发帖

大全-1-20

Questions 19-20 are based on the following.>>

Archaeologists seeking the location of a legendary siege and destruction of a city are excavating in several possible places, including a middle and a lower layer of a large mound. The bottom of the middle layer contains some pieces of pottery of type 3, known to be from a later period than the time of the destruction of the city, but the lower layer does not.>>

20. The force of the evidence cited above is most seriously weakened if which of the following is true?>>

(A) Gerbils, small animals long native to the area, dig large burrows into which objects can fall when the burrows collapse.>>

(B) Pottery of types 1 and 2, found in the lower level, was used in the cities from which, according to the legend, the besieging forces came.>>

(C) Several pieces of stone from a lower-layer wall have been found incorporated into the remains of a building in the middle layer.

(D) Both the middle and the lower layer show evidence of large-scale destruction of habitations by fire.(A)

(E) Bronze ax heads of a type used at the time of the siege were found in the lower level of excavation.

这题的题目看得稀里糊涂,不太明白他要问的是什么?

收藏 分享

这题我是这样理解的,在中层底部发现城市被摧毁以后年代的陶器,而底层没有,说明中层不太可能代表摧毁之前的情况。但A提供了他因,说明中层有以后年代的陶器但还有可能是代表摧毁前的情况的,因此削弱了文章中证据的说服力。

TOP

谢谢,

我就觉得这题好像没有结论呢,说明中层不太可能代表摧毁之前的情况,

我当时也这么想来着,但就是原文没有说吧

TOP

yea, 這題很怪, 原文是沒有conclusion.
可是反正題目也沒有要求weaken the conclusion, 而是要求weaken那evidence的可靠性.

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看