返回列表 发帖

请教大家两道逻辑题!!

Instead of blaming an airline accident on pilot error, investigators should find out why the error was made by analyzing airplane design,airline management,and pilot-training programs. For only then can changes be made to ensure that the same to ensure that the same type of error doesn't recur and cause another accident.

which of the following is a presupposition of the argument above??

A.Pilot error is not a contributing factor in most airline accident.

D.Investigators of airline accidents should contribute to the prevention of future accidents.

ANS.请问为什么不能是A啊????

 

 

2.When people predict that a certain result will not take place unless a certain action is taken, they believe that they have learned that the prediction is correct when the action is taken and the result occurs. On reflection, however,it often becomes clear that the result admits of more than one interpretation.

which of the following, if true,best supports the claims above.

A. Judging the success of an action requires specifying the goal of the action.

B. Judging which action to take after a prediction is made requires knowing about other actions that have been successful in similar past situations.

C.Learning whether a certain perdictive strategy is good requires knowing the result of using that strategy through several trials.

D.Distinguishing a correct predition and effective action from an incorrect predition and ineffective action is often impossible.

E.Making a successful prediction requires knowing the facts about the context of that prediction.

ANS.为什么不是B呀??

谢谢大家,麻烦啦~~~

收藏 分享

QUOTE:
Instead of blaming an airline accident on pilot error, investigators should find out why the error was made by analyzing airplane design,airline management,and pilot-training programs. For only then can changes be made to ensure that the same to ensure that the same type of error doesn't recur and cause another accident.

which of the following is a presupposition of the argument above??

A.Pilot error is not a contributing factor in most airline accident.

D.Investigators of airline accidents should contribute to the prevention of future accidents.

ANS.请问为什么不能是A啊????

试着解答一下如下:

文章说,为了防止同样的事故【accident】发生(一个目标),一群人【investigators】不是责备驾驶失误,而是要分析找出造成驾驶失误的很多因素,现在问前提

A,驾驶失误不是造成很多事故的原因----这点没有支持作用,因为即使是其他因素,也是通过驾驶失误这种形式体现的;

D,说这群人有义务避免这类事故,对的,支持了原文,如果不,那他们没有必要做那样的分析了

TOP

QUOTE:

2.When people predict that a certain result will not take place unless a certain action is taken, they believe that they have learned that the prediction is correct when the action is taken and the result occurs. On reflection, however,it often becomes clear that the result admits of more than one interpretation.

which of the following, if true,best supports the claims above.

A. Judging the success of an action requires specifying the goal of the action.

B. Judging which action to take after a prediction is made requires knowing about other actions that have been successful in similar past situations.

C.Learning whether a certain perdictive strategy is good requires knowing the result of using that strategy through several trials.

D.Distinguishing a correct predition and effective action from an incorrect predition and ineffective action is often impossible.

E.Making a successful prediction requires knowing the facts about the context of that prediction.

ANS.为什么不是B呀??

谢谢大家,麻烦啦~~~

大难题啊,我的理解是这样子的:

原文:

目的--预测“一个结果不会发生除非一个action发生”,那么手段----观察“action发生后,结果发生了”那么预测就算对了(显然逻辑上不严密)

结论--显然以上做法不对,因为一个结果可能有多个解释(也就是不一定要action 发生,即使action不发生,结果也可能由别的因素造成,因此上述手段,要解决他们的目标“判断预测是否正确”,是不对的)下面问加强。

A. Judging the success of an action requires specifying the goal of the action.
评判一个行动是否成功,需要清晰行动的目标,与文章推理无关

B. Judging which action to take after a prediction is made requires knowing about other actions that have been successful in similar past situations.

在一个预测作出后,判断采取哪个行动需要知道,其他因素在相似情形下成功的,很混淆,但是即使知道其他行动,并影响了采取什么行动来验证预测,又有什么用呢?

C.Learning whether a certain perdictive strategy is good requires knowing the result of using that strategy through several trials.

学习一个预测是否正确,要知道在多个实验中使用这个策略的结果,这个也无关

D.Distinguishing a correct predition and effective action from an incorrect predition and ineffective action is often impossible.

分辨一个正确的预测和有效的行动,和一个不正确的预测和无效的行动,经常是无效的(做不到的),这句话就是将原文的意思再说了一次,原文说那种方式不行,这里归纳说,
基本做不到,就是有这个目标,用什么办法都可能做不到,这是支持的,但是支持的力度强了一些

E.Making a successful prediction requires knowing the facts about the context of that prediction.

做一个成功的预测需要知道对这个预测的相关上下文细节,与推理无关

这题过于抽象,难度极大,我认为不应该是GMAT的,在LSAT中都属于非常难的

TOP

就是C啊。首先是说增长了。 但是他说的增长是绝对数目的增长。 相对于比如通货膨胀,这个增长可能就可以忽略甚至还不如以前高。 你可以想想物价,如果不理解。

TOP

第二题让我来简而言之看看:

结论说的是结果的产生是可以有多种解释的(也就是不一定是prediction的那个版本)

B的重心放在了如何做一个正确的judgement(其实我觉得它本身的说法也有问题,因为并不充分)

D主要说这个judgement做的时候到底对不对是不得而知的,因为有很多因素阿(即便像B说的knowing about other actions that have been successful in similar past situations.也不算全阿),所以更好的加强了结论。

对了,我觉得第一题真挺tricky的,时间一紧看a就选了,细读后D是没有异议的~

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看