- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 860
- 经验
- 860 点
- 威望
- 85 点
- 金钱
- 85 ¥
- 魅力
- 85
|
OG12 -CR-109
109. Springfield Fire Commissioner: The vast majority of false fire alarms are prank calls made anonymously from fire alarm boxes on street corners. Since virtually everyone has access to a private telephone, these alarm boxes have outlived their usefulness. Therefore, we propose to remove the boxes. Removing the boxes will reduce the number of prank calls without hampering people’s ability to report a fire.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim that the proposal, if carried out, will have the announced effect?
(A) The fi re department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones and records where they came from.
(B) Maintaining the fi re alarm boxes costs Springfi eld approximately $5 million annually.
(C) A telephone call can provide the fi re department with more information about the nature and size of a fi re than can an alarm placed from an alarm box.
(D) Responding to false alarms signifi cantly reduces the fire department’s capacity for responding to fires.
(E) On any given day, a signifi cant percentage of the public telephones in Springfi eld are out of service.
原文中两个观点:
1、采取原文的提议可以减少假火警
2、不会影响人们报告火灾
OG解释正确答案为A,因为记录电话来源有效制止假的火警。并且说E是对原文Weaken的,因为E提出了有些人在alarm fire附近发现火灾但没有私人电话的可能性,这样就不能达到2的目的。但我的想法是,既然原来就有很大部分的功用电话不能用,那么就算取消了就不会影响人们报告火警啊(因为即不取消也用不了),这样E不就是加强了么= =
我发现我居然和OG思路这么不一样……
希望大家能帮我引导引导思路,谢谢了!!!!!! |
|