Argument 38,
The reasoning of the editorial is problematic for three reasons:
1. The argument assumes that increasing the occupancy rates can boost the revenue.
However, it is entirely possible that revenue continue to decrease even though occupancy rates increase.
The reason is simple. Revenue is not proportional to
occupancy rates but to the product of rent and number of rented house.
2. The argument relies on the gratuitous assumption that the current rent of campus
housing is high, causing the low demand for the campus housing. No data or evidence
supplied in this editorial to support this arguement.
3. The arguement assumes that lowering rent can lead to higher revenue by increasing
demand for campus housing.
.
[此贴子已经被作者于2003-4-5 22:16:02编辑过] |