以下是引用weirdsu在2005-8-8 0:23:00的发言:
Hi,what kind of shot do I have at schools like HBS, Wharton, Stanford, Kellogg, Sloan with the following -
- 720 GMAT / 3.6 gpa - bs and ms in engineering at a top university - 3 years technical work experience at a very well-known tech company (industry leader) - interesting business related extra-curriculars in college (but that was 3 years ago) - an internship as a summer i-banking analyst (again, 4 years ago)
Negatives: - have had very little opportunity to demonstrate leadership in my job. - not a great interviewer - recs will probably be mediocre (don't think my superiors/peers at work really have any concept of how to write a good rec and don't think there is much interesting stuff they can say about my work experience)
Any chance at schools like Haas, Anderson, Columbia, if not at the 'top 5'? i am looking to apply in round 1 for these schools and start school in the fall of '06.
Any feedback is appreciated. Thanks!
Hi Weirsun, thanks for your inquiry!
Your academic qualifications are fine and you've cleared the hurdle at any school. The admissions committees are not going to be impressed by your employer's market cap. What they will care about, though, is your career progression. Furthermore, it will be a bit more difficult to differentiate your work experience given the large number of tech applicants b-schools see each year.
You may need to do some quick positioning work to address these issues before the fall arrives. Unless it can be spun properly, your lack of recent extracurriculars will also likely be a strike against you.The lack of leadership experience will hurt you.
Interviews can be practiced and very nearly perfected. It's a matter of knowing what questions they will ask you (questions vary from applicant to applicant given their different backgrounds) and receiving critical feedback on your responses and if and how those responses can be further strengthened.
For the record, the vast majority of recommendations are considered good in so much as they make flattering comments about the applicant. (Of course, these recommenders are selected by the applicant for just these qualities.) The key to getting a truly great recommendation that can help get you into that top 10% to 20% of admitted applicants, though, is to select the applicants who also know you well and substantiate your story and themes.
Even with round 1 applications, you are likely fighting an uphill battle given the partial information I received about you here. In other words, unless there are some good 憌ow?factors to help mitigate some of the concerns you shared, you are not going to be competitive at a top 5 MBA program and you will be a stretch at a top 15.
If you would like a very detailed analysis of your candidacy as well as a detailed action plan to ensure you are properly positioned for your future applications, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Best of luck with your applications!
Sincerely,
HS Wang
|