返回列表 发帖
先给出OG的解释:
Choice A, the best answer, uses the idiomatic construction “noted... that” and clearly focuses on the salient information-- a comparison of annual earnings. In B, the structure of “noted... that the elephant, giving rides ..., had been earning” falsely implies that the reader already knows about the elephant--that is, that the existence of this particular elephant is not new information.
也就是说A用的是限定性定语从句,而B用的分词是非限定性的。

TOP

the past perfect "had been" improperly places the elephant's earning in the past, prior to Wootton's; consistent verb tense is needed to show that the actions are simultaneous.

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看