返回列表 发帖

OG13-86

In 2000, a mere two dozen products accounted for half the increase in spending on prescription drugs, a phenomenon that is explained not just because of more expensive drugs but by the fact that doctors are writing many more prescriptions for higher-cost drugs.
(A) a phenomenon that is explained not just because of more expensive drugs but by the fact that doctors are writing
(B) a phenomenon that is explained not just by the fact that drugs are becoming more expensive but also by the fact that doctors are writing
(C) a phenomenon occurring not just because of drugs that are becoming more expensive but because of doctors having also written
(D) which occurred not just because drugs are becoming more expensive but doctors are also writing
(E) which occurred not just because of more expensive drugs but because doctors have also written
答案是B

请教下C中 not just because of drugs that .... but because of doctors .... 不是平行的吗?"that are becoming more expensive"定语从句修饰"drugs"; "having also written many more prescriptions for higher-cost drugs " 动宾形式修饰"doctors"。是不是由于"having also written"的时态错应该用"writing"啊?!

但OG解释说是:The phrasing drugs that are becoming and doctors having also written are awkward and confusing; the placement of also is incorrect. 那么awkward and confusing在哪里呢?

请NN来回答下吧!!
收藏 分享

感谢   的答复。我想having written 肯定是不对的,再怎么说也该用writing。让我恍然大悟啊

TOP

返回列表

站长推荐 关闭


美国top10 MBA VIP申请服务

自2003年开始提供 MBA 申请服务以来,保持着90% 以上的成功率,其中Top10 MBA服务成功率更是高达95%


查看