国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA

标题: 急问：Warwick 还是 Cranfield? [打印本页]

作者: carrycarry 时间: 2003-5-8 02:12 标题: 急问：Warwick 还是 Cranfield?

MBA, Warwick and Cranfield which one is better?
I think Cranfield is teaching in US method, the study is mainly focus in team discussion, and 40% of teaching content is case study. Tuition 24000 pounds.

Warwick university gets good reputation. strong in Business research and consulting...

想听听各位的意见，多谢了！

作者: sunflower 时间: 2003-5-9 14:36

Since in most cases, you won't get jobs in UK after MBA and may have to work in mianland CHina or Holgkong, the reputation of the school may be more important.

You can combine the overall factors.

作者: zhysarah 时间: 2003-5-9 23:21

难道Cranfield就没名气吗？

作者: M012Smile 时间: 2003-5-11 23:13

W应该好些！

作者: carrycarry 时间: 2003-5-13 00:19

but the MBA ranking in Business Week, Cranfield is the 2nd in UK, besides, the programme content in Cranfield is US style, and the admission demand including averate GMAT score and working exp. of cranfield is higher than Warwick. Can't it indicate Cranfield provide better quality MBA than Warwick?

作者: carrycarry 时间: 2003-5-13 00:30

我现在比较倾向Cranfield,尽管很多人都说将来回国的话Warwick更有名些，可我感觉Cranfield的授课方式更加美国化，他更加注重对学生综合管理素质，包括一些soft skills 的培养。
我现在就是比较想知道那些选Warwick的理由，除了他有名，有排名，还有些什么其它理由？。。

欢迎光临国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/)