标题: LSAT: TEST SIX__SECTION II__2 [打印本页] 作者: liushiyou 时间: 2003-3-23 21:41 标题: LSAT: TEST SIX__SECTION II__2
Physiological research has uncovered disturbing evidence linking a number of structural disorders to jogging. Among the ailments seemingly connected with this now-popular sport are spinal disk displacements, stress fractures of the feet and ankles, and tenfonitis. Furthermore, these injuries do not occur exclusively among beginning runners-veteran joggers suffer an equal percentage of injuries. What the accumulating data suggest is that the human anatomy is not able to withstand the stresses of jogging.
Which one of the following is an assumption of the argument?
(A) The link between jogging and certain structual disorders appears to be a causal one.
----------------
A. Why?作者: atongmu 时间: 2003-3-24 10:48
提干的推理是：无数病例推出human anatomy is not able to withstand the stresses of jogging。
A选项取非慢跑和structual disorders无因果关系显然推翻了提干的论据，达到了weaken的效果。作者: atongmu 时间: 2003-3-24 10:54
补充一下：本题用排除法做也比较清楚
(B) Jogging causes more serious disorders than other sports.
(C) The jogger's level of experience is a factor determining the likelihood of a jogging injury.
(D) Some sports are safer for the human body than jogging.
