The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown is quite foolish. There is sufficient funding to pay the salaries of the new officers, but not the salaries of additional court and prison employees to process the increased caseload of arrests and convictions that new officers usually generate.

Which of the following, if true, will most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?

(A) Studies have shown that an increase in a city’s police force does not necessarily reduce crime.

(B) When one major city increased its police force by 19 percent last year, there were 40 percent more arrests and 13 percent more convictions.

(C) If funding for the new police officers’ salaries is approved, support for other city services will have to be reduced during the next fiscal year.

(D) In most United States cities, not all arrests result in convictions, and not all convictions result in prison terms.

(E) Middletown’s ratio of police officers to citizens has reached a level at which an increase in the number of officers will have a deterrent effect on crime.

I choose D for it can explain relationship of funding about arrests and convictions,and I think answer E is talking about effectiveness about new police officers,and so answer E is NOT relevant with discussion in the question.

so why e is right?can some nn tell me?

3x in advance

Given D is the fact for some caseloads, total caseload of arrests and convictions could still increase;

E have the drect effects of decreasing caselods of arrests and convictions.