Board logo

标题: one CR to warm up [打印本页]

作者: primefang    时间: 2002-7-29 10:36     标题: one CR to warm up

Explanation must be distinguished from justification. Every human action potentially has an explanation, that is with sufficient knowledge it would be possible to give an accurate description of the causes of that action. An action is justified only when the person performing the action has sufficient reasons for the action. According to many psychologists, even when there is a justification for an action, that justification often forms no part of the explanation. The general principle, however, is that only an action whose justification , that is, the reasons for the action, forms an essential part of its explanation is rational.

If the statements in the passage are correct, which one of the following can be properly conclude from them?
A.        When a human action is justified, that action has no explanation.
B.        If there are any reasons among the causes of an action, the that action rational.
C.        Some psychologists believe that the justification for an action never forms an essential part of its explanation.
D.        There are actions whose causes can’t be discovered.
E.        If any human actions are rationa, then reasons must sometimes be causes of actions.
作者: little_fox    时间: 2002-7-29 17:45

应该是E吧,由文章最后一句,行为要是理性的,只有当确证(REASONS)构成解释的(CAUSES)的基本部分,对吗?混淆选项是D,但我觉得DISCOVERED用的不好。
作者: primefang    时间: 2002-7-29 19:11

yes, ,拜托 再帮我看看数学吧 ,留了一些题




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2