Board logo

标题: 几个新东方补充材料上的问题请教 [打印本页]

作者: lizzie    时间: 2003-1-16 16:25     标题: 几个新东方补充材料上的问题请教

1、补P161 15
Technological education is worsening. People between eighteen and twenty-four, who are just emerging from their formal education, are more likely to be technologically illiterate than somewhat older adults. And yet, issue for public will increasingly involve aspects of technology.
Which of the following conclusion can be properly drawn from the statement above?
a)        if all young people are to make informed decisions on public referenda, many of them learn more about technology.
Ans is a)
这道题怎么理解?

2、P220 178
the recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business, in which many small firms have gone out of business, has been attributed to the advent of office-equipment “superstores” whose high sales volume keeps their prices low. This analysis is flawed, however, since even today the superstore control a very small share of the retail market.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument that the analysis is flawed?
b)        the superstore’s heavy advertising of their low prices has forced prices down throughout the retail market for office supplies.
Ans is b)
这个答案怎么weaken 呢?我觉得好象不是很明显啊?

3、P233  215
in several cities, the government is going ahead with ambitious construction projects despite the high office-vacancy rates in these cities. The vacant offices, though available for leasing, unfortunately do not meet the requirements for the facilities needed, such as court houses and laboratories. The government, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?
a)        adapatation of vacant office space to meet the government’s requirements, if possible, would not make leasing such office space a more cost-effective alternative to new construction.
我怎么觉得这是削弱呢?cost-effective 是指节约吗?
作者: 回家过年    时间: 2003-1-16 17:46

1.infer题的答案确实不是很明显,可能需要很多推导,我也没有什么好主意,我想需要对比推敲其它选项吧.
2.确实是削弱,至于很不很明显不重要,只要是最明显就好了
3.题干:政府将有很多基建尽管很高的办公室空闲率.空闲的办公室虽然能够出租,却没有达到设备的需要,如用于法庭和实验室.因此政府没有浪费之嫌.
假设A:采用空办公室来满足政府的需要(如果可能)不比出租他们更有经济价值(合算).这是一个排除他因的假设




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2