Board logo

标题: GWD29-14 [打印本页]

作者: tongxiao88    时间: 2006-10-31 06:23     标题: GWD29-14

Q14:

In 1850 Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights and for changes in the married women’s property laws.

 

  1. arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights
  2. arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women
  3. a treatise that advocates women’s equal political and legal rights
  4. a treatise advocating women’s equal political and legal rights
  5. a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women

   Answer: E

我选A

我的问题是:treatise可以自己argue吗?

觉得逻辑意思不对啊?

A哪里错了内


作者: nikema    时间: 2006-10-31 19:45

treatise是论著的意思,这种类型的句子优选出现新名词同位语的选项;然后,argue for是主张、赞成的意思,不一定需要人做施动者;A错在arguing修饰人,还是修饰那篇论文,不清楚,不如同位语结构好;A还错在两个for不平行。

作者: cherrywds    时间: 2006-11-1 20:09

i pick B,

in E, i don't think that "argued for" is a correct tense here, because the past tense means that the action "argue" only occured one time in the past, rather than many times.

so, the expression in E seems to distort the original meaning of the sentence.

would somebody tell me what's wrong in B ?

thx...

 






欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2