标题: one qeustions in LSAT SET 2, SECIV [打印本页] 作者: justag 时间: 2003-1-7 12:08 标题: one qeustions in LSAT SET 2, SECIV
12. “Though they soon will, patients should not have a legal right to see their medical records. As a doctor, I see two reasons for this. First, giving them access will be time-wasting because it will significantly reduce the amount of time that medical staff can spend on more important duties, by forcing them to retrieve and return files. Second, if my experience is anything to go by, no patients are going to ask for access to their records anyway.”
Which one of the following, if true, establishes that the doctor’s second reason does not cancel out the first?
(A) The new law will require that doctors, when seeing a patient in their office, must be ready to produce the patient’s records immediately, not just ready to retrieve them.
(B) The task of retrieving and returning files would fall to the lowest-paid member of a doctor’s office staff.
(C) Any patients who asked to see their medical records would also insist on having details they did not understand explained to them.
(D) The new law does not rule out that doctors may charge patients for extra expenses incurred specifically in order to comply with the new law.
(E) Some doctors have all allowing their patients access to their medical records, but those doctors’ patients took no advantage of this policy.作者: 回家过年 时间: 2003-1-8 19:01
"...if my experience is anything to go by..."是什么意思,谁能给解释解释.
LSAT太蹩脚了,我懵个E吧,大家献计献策啊作者: justag 时间: 2003-1-8 23:11
the ans is A.作者: lisaislisa 时间: 2003-1-9 23:44
首先,题目问有第二个原因, 可以不用第一个原因--除了,也就是说有第二个还必须有第一个
第一个原因是说拿record给病人费时 第二个是说如果医生水平足够好, 病人不会要看record
A 中新规则要求record要即时给病人看 这就还需要第一个--考虑到拿record费时
不知道这样解释对不对..
^^
欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/)
