AWA：AA：A country of Sacchard 希望通过decrease the price of sugar, a primary exportation to reduce the trade deficit.因为降价会提高糖的出口量，提高糖的出口量可以缩小贸易差。

1．  降价未必能提高出口，因为，可能是其他问题影响出口，如质量。

2．  提高糖的出口未必缩小贸易差。

3．  忽视了市场的变动，可能糖降价了，而市场已经改变。

AI：a company’s long-term success is primary dependent on Job satisfaction and Job security felt by employees

顺便提一下，我一战650，但作文为5（其实我的作文水平是很低的。去年考雅思作文只有5分），9月15日刚收到的正式的作文分数.所以这次还是用这个摸版，如下：

ISSUE:
Recently there is a debate over whether …..Some people assert that.., while other people believe that…As a matter of fact, the issue of whether ….. is a complex and controversial one. Different people hold different views due to their distinct backgrounds. Therefore, there is not a universal answer to this question, and whether one choice takes precedence over the other may quite depend on the specific situation. The decision, nevertheless, is not an easy one to make. Actually, the final judgment should rely on a case-by-case analysis. As far as I am concerned, however, I agree that …. , and do not agree that….. My view can be greatly substantiated by the following discussions.

The first argument that can be presented to develop my position is that… A good example may be found in the case that… Under this circumstance, it is obvious that….

In addition, there is another reason for me to choose this statement. The reason is not far to seek…. To illustrate, let us consider that … Hence, another equally important aspect is that….

Admittedly, it may be true that …. in some conditions. However, this alone does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that ….,Actually, these cases are rare and therefore are too specific and too weak to strengthen the view that…When the advantages and disadvantages of x and y are carefully examined, the most striking conclusion is obvious that…

To sum up, due to the above mentioned reasons, which sometimes correlate with each other to generate an integrate whole and thus become more convincing than any single one of them, we may be comfortable to say that …., because….

ARGUMENT

In this argument, the author concludes that… To support his conclusion, the author points out that…. In addition, the author reasons that…
Further more, he also assumes that … . At first glance, the author’s argument appears to be somehow appealing, while a close examination will reveal how groundless it is. We do not have to look very far to see the invalidity of this argument. This argument is problematic for the following reasons.

In the first place, this argument rests on a gratuitous assumption that …. The author unfairly assumes that…. However, the assumption is questionable because the author provides no evidence to support this argument. The arguer fails to take into account other facts that might contribute to the result that …….. It is likely that , ……………..; it is also likely that ………………………… Any of these scenarios, if true, would show that ………………….. (72)Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility.

In the second place, the argument commits a logic fallacy of “after this and therefore because of this”. In no case can the mere fact that… be cited as evidence to support the assumption that there is a causal-effect relationship between A and B. Moreover, that just because B can be statistically correlated with A does not necessarily mean that A is the cause of B. In fact, the author has obviously neglected the possibility of other alternative facts such as…, or … may contribute to a certain extent to B. It may be only a coincidence that …… . Unless the author can rule out other factors relevant to …, this assumption in question can not be accepted.

In the third place, the evidence that the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is rarely sufficient to establish a general conclusion. Unless the arguer can show that A1 is representative of all A, the conclusion that B… is completely unwarranted. In fact, in face of such limited evidence, it is fallacious to draw any conclusion at all. 

In the fourth place, the argument has also committed a false analogy fallacy. The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects, and the author assumes without justification that all things are equal, and that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. There is, however, no guarantee that this is the case. Nor does the author cite any evidence to support this assumption. Lacking this assumption, the conclusion that … is entirely unfounded. In fact, it is highly doubtful that the facts drawn from B are applicable to A. Differences between A and B clearly out weight the similarities, thus making the analogy highly less than valid. For example, A..., however, B.... Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B to do....

In addition, the conclusion unjustifiably relies on the poll while the validity of the survey itself is doubtful. The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who, when, how and by whom the survey is conducted, neither does it mention what is the sample size, or how the samples are selected. Until these questions are answered the results are worthless as evidence to support that….

Besides, the author assumes that A and B are mutually exclusive alternatives. However, the author has never offered any reasons or evidences for imposing an either/or choice. Common sense and observation tells us that adjoining both A and B might produce better results. 

To sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the author claims. To make the argument more convincing concerning…. , the arguer would have to provide more information that………………. The arguer should also demonstrate that……………….to make this argument logically acceptable.  (51) 

Since the author commits the above mentioned logical mistakes and fails to consider the whole situation comprehensively, his ideas should not be adopted. The conclusion would be strengthened if he….

In conclusion, the arguer fails to substantiate his claim that …. Because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer claims. To strengthen the argument, the arguer must convince us that…. In addition, the arguer could have to provide more precise information to support his claim.

It is entirely possible that management has become lax regarding any number of factors that can affect the bottom line such as inferior products, careless product pricing, inefficient production, poor employee expense monitoring, ineffective advertising, sloppy buying policies and other wasteful spending.

数学JJ我就不提了，除了忘了的，都是本月以前的JJ，感谢前面的JJ贡献者。

SC

1-SC的第一题让我有点儿懵，选项是：a unit 动词by名词, or a unit by名词，另有一个选项：a unit 动词by名词, or名词，我选前者，吃不准，感觉后者简单，但名词的平行confused，而前者虽然长，但省略动词，付合语法。

2-有一题，选项为as those purchasing, 比较肯定。

3-On effort to 还是 for effort to, 我选on effort to

4-GWD14-Q20:

Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of the Maya as an achievement, the army of terra-cotta warriors created to protect Qin Shi Huang, China’s first emperor, in his afterlife is more than 2,000 years old and took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete them.

1. took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete them

2. took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete it

3. took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete

4. 700,000 artisans took more than 36 years to complete

5. to complete them took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years

   Answer: C

划线比GWD中长，如上

4-有一题，还有一题考到unlike。但是要么明显不对称，要么有个because在比较对象前。

最后我选了A. Because Japanese government, unlike European Governments, 动词单数... 我理解unlike做插入语吧，并且那个后面的单数很重要，没有修饰欧洲政府的歧义

       同意，我也选A；还有一答案B。Unlike European Governments，because Japanese government,这是错的，因为，这样一来，Unlike European Governments修饰主句。

5-.一个SC，考as + clause 和
 in much the same way that + clause 的区别，从句内容都是一样的，刚想起来的。

   这道题的大意是：Recently a type of computer rebelled …….as 20years ago a type of computer rebelled ……..

       我选as + clause, 用as引导比较结构。

6-有一题，说的是a India queen(记不清了)，disguise herself as a warrior and,meanuving……,…….大致是这样， 我选的是disguise herself as a warrior and,meanuving……,……. 这里and 连接后面的一个动词结构，而meanuving……是修饰后面的。

严重感谢RC机经，我这次考试的四篇阅读都是JJ中详细提到的。谢谢NN们的杰出贡献！

第一篇阅读：（感觉文章挺绕，而且有几个 关键的单词都不然认识）

16. （版本1）是讲购物的，说是一个科学家提出，认为人的选择越多，越不利于选择.   然后拿出个实验，人们买jam, 说虽然大家喜欢多点选择，但是在两个试验组里，一个组有6种选，一个组24种，那个6种的组买jam的行为是24个的组的10倍。进一步提出一个例子就是在人们面对比如养老保险之类的问题上，选择越多越麻烦。都是一个目的，后来这里考了个例子作用题。第二段另一个科学家提出理论，说只有在一种情况下，众多选择人们也会轻易作出选择，那就是在开始已经有了明显的倾向了。这片阅读里考了个逻辑题。

第二篇（结构停清晰，JJ很重要，感觉这篇明显做的比第一篇好）

7. 段一说这个语系从马达加斯加延伸到夏威夷，全世界有987种这个语系的语言。其中14种属于一个非常与众不同的sub语系MP。这个语系由于最近才在不同地理位置spread，所以相互之间差别不大。

第二段说这个MP有三个子系，他们相互类似。同时与一种台湾的Austroasiatic语系分支也类似。结论是台湾是3个MP子语系的发源地。

第三段进一步论证第二段的解释（evidence），说这个MP的三个子系和台湾的语系有很多食物（crop）的词汇相似，并且在Austroasiatic的其他语系中就没有这些词。

问题1、马达加斯加。。。，我想了很久，选了没有b和t的表示CROP的词语。？3、文章的主题是什么？

第三篇

弱势群体--妇女地位。第一段说现象，历史学家很奇怪美国妇女在二战期间的地位提高为什么没有在战后得到持续。然后一个学者提出了一种解释：是媒体作用，二战期间需要劳动力，所以媒体宣扬妇女出门打工。第二段开始详细例举解释媒体在二战期间对改变妇女形象的举动，两份杂志（一个交Post,另一个叫True Story），都是正面报道说妇女在工作中的良好表现改变了妇女的地位（有一道题），为了说明它们还把战前有关妇女工作后导致事业和家庭的矛盾的例子加以修改（infer 她们在战前其实是面临事业和家庭的矛盾）。(有一道题问战前妇女的，选她们面临事业和家庭的矛盾)第三段说两个故事的不同点。

第四篇阅读非常简单：

24.      关于美国历史上约1910年出现的“scout girl（女童子军） “ 的影响了的讨论。

1段： Historians 认为，没有什么值得关心的，因为还是EMPHASIZE ON SOME DEMESTIC SKILLS， AND COMPLY(顺从, 答应, 遵守) WITH THE OLD RUTINES。但S这个人的STUDY CONTRAST WITH THE HISTORIANS（这是主题题的正确选项：summarize a study contrast with the historians） 的观点

2段：尽管“SCOUT GIRL(女童子军)“主要是培养女孩的家务水平，但是也有“BOY SCOUT ”的一些内容；组织通过incentives such as badge, ranking to encourage them to get self-esteem(这是一个细节题的选项，由于该选项用了reject,所以是错的。)而且，该组织还针对与培养女孩在PUBLIC TALENTS.

3段：虽然在1930年，该组织的重点有了一些变化，在1960年以后又回到了其对PUBLIC TALENTS 的培养上。

考题：1 WHY THE HISTORIANS 不想研究“SCOUT GIRL？选认为墨守陈规的那个

2 1930 的“SCOUT GIRL“ 怎么改变了，我根据原文的强对比，（第3段）选不重视培养PUBILIC INTEREST，同意

3 主题题，结构  

CR: 本月的CRJJ很重要，一定要认真看