标题: GWD 5-41,请指点! [打印本页]
作者: xirui2000 时间: 2006-9-15 06:26 标题: GWD 5-41,请指点!
Magazine Publisher: Our magazine does not have a liberal bias. It is true that when a book review we had commissioned last year turned out to express distinctly conservative views, we did not publish it until we had also obtained a second review that took a strongly liberal position. Clearly, however, our actions demonstrate not a bias in favor of liberal views but rather a commitment to a balanced presentation of diverse opinions.
Determining which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the cogency of the magazine publisher’s response?
- Whether any other magazines in which the book was reviewed carried more than one review of the book
- Whether the magazine publishes unsolicited book reviews as well as those that it has commissioned
- Whether in the event that a first review commissioned by the magazine takes a clearly liberal position the magazine would make any efforts to obtain further reviews
- Whether the book that was the subject of the two reviews was itself written from a clearly conservative or a clearly liberal point of view
- Whether most of the readers of the magazine regularly read the book reviews that the magazine publishes
为什么选C?
作者: sunjueliang 时间: 2006-9-15 21:57
Magazine publisher says that the magazine does not have a liberal bias.But last year it did not publish a conservative book review until it obtained a strongly liberal review. The magazine publisher argues that it was not because of bias that it did not publish the conservative book review, but because it need a balanced views. In order to prove that the magazine publisher waits for the second review for balanced views, the magazine publisher has to show us that it would wait for a second view(conservative one) too if it first receives a liberal book review.
作者: xirui2000 时间: 2006-9-18 20:29
thanks a lot !!!
欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) |
Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |