Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstrated that his theory about the determinants of rat behavior generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze. On the basis of this evidence, Dr. Ladlow has claimed that his theory is irrefutably correct.

Anson: Then Dr. Ladlow is not a responsible psychologist, Dr. Ladlow’s evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct. Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.

A.        an attack on Dr. Ladlow’s character

B.        the application of a general principle

C.        the use of an ambiguous term

D.       the discrediting of facts

好象没告诉答案吧......询问答案??

i will choose B

A no attact the specific character any more

C no term is used

D no suspicicous the facts

E no reject the explanation