Board logo

标题: hi 2sc [打印本页]

作者: celeste    时间: 2002-6-28 18:08     标题: hi 2sc

The books of W.E.B. DuBois before World War I constituted as fundamental a challenge to the accepted ideas of race relations (that, two generations later will be true of) the writings of the radical writers of the 1960's.
A) that, two generations later will be true of
B) that, two generations later, would be true of
C) as, two generations later , would be true of
D) as, two generations later, would
E) just in the way that, two generations later, did


1,the books did as adj. (...) as,..., would the writings. , a " as adj. a n. as" 结构,would 后省constituted, be true of 无法找到依据,逻辑不支持,d 结构很工整,作者用writings 代替books 避免重复。????


Modernization has gone hand in hand (and has offered incentives for such things as personal initiative and ambition, hard work, and resourcefulness.)
A) and has offered incentives for such things as personal initiative and ambition, hard work, and resourcefulness
B) with and has offered incentives for such things as personal initiative and ambition, hard work, and resourcefulness
C) with and has offered incentives for such things as personal initiative and ambition, hard work, and the ability to be resourceful
D) and has offered incentives such as personal initiative and ambition, hard work, and
resourcefulness
E) and is offering incentives for such things as personal initiative and ambition, hard work, and resourcefulness

i prefer e
[em10][em12][em13][em19]
作者: tongxun    时间: 2002-6-28 19:17

1、D应该是正确答案,但解释中的“作者用writings 代替books 避免重复”我认为完全胡说!两者绝非代替的关系!解释中还有一个“be true of 无法找到依据,逻辑不支持”,我个人不同意这种说法,我认为不能用的原因是:无可比性。
2、从句意上讲,我倾向B。E的事态有问题。
作者: tongxun    时间: 2002-6-29 00:25

"E、偶认为词性不对称”。你这是那题?-----指带不明。
是第二题吗?正确答案是哪个?词性怎样不对?
作者: tongxun    时间: 2002-6-30 23:58

yes, you are right.
作者: jenny    时间: 2002-7-1 00:15

那么为什么不是a,一样对称啊(第二题)为什么有个with?[em08]
作者: tongxun    时间: 2002-7-1 00:20

因为若没有with则Modernization has gone hand in hand 不完整。
作者: celeste    时间: 2002-7-1 10:58

2:也就是  Modernization has gone with hand in hand ?
作者: tongxun    时间: 2002-7-1 11:36

Modernization has gone hand in hand with
作者: jenny    时间: 2002-7-1 11:58

不懂,has gone hand in hand with?是什么意思,什么语法?
作者: Q30    时间: 2002-7-1 12:09

呵呵,hand in hand with 不会是固定搭配吧
作者: tongxun    时间: 2002-7-1 12:46

应该不会。with此处应表示伴行的意思。你不觉得没有WITH,句子读的很别扭吗?
不过,现在就等原题的主人给答案了。
作者: celeste    时间: 2002-7-1 16:05

b is the answer
作者: primefang    时间: 2002-7-20 12:36

到底hand in hand with 是什么意思?
作者: redpot    时间: 2002-8-6 07:46

Ya.  What is the meaning of "gone hand in hand with"?
作者: daisych    时间: 2002-8-9 17:32

我觉得如果有with的话,应该在with 后面再补出一个名词,我选d
作者: sunny    时间: 2002-8-14 18:30

这题怎么还在讨论,要从句意上来判断,不是hand in hand with而是go with,和offered incentives for 构成平行结构,接后面的宾语such things .hand in hand 做状语,修饰go with




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2