Citing the fact that the real gross
domestic product (GDP) per capita was
higher in 1997 than ever before, some
Line journalists have argued that the United
(5) States economy performed ideally in
1997. However, the real GDP is almost
always higher than ever before; it falls
only during recessions. One point
these journalists overlooked is that in
(10) 1997, as in the twenty-four years imme-
diately preceding it, the real GDP per
capita grew nearly one-half percent a
year more slowly than it had on aver-
age between 1873 and 1973. Were the
(15) 1997 economy as robust as claimed,
the growth rate of real GDP per capita
in 1997 would have surpassed the
average growth rate of real GDP per
capita between 1873 and 1973 because
(20) over fifty percent of the population
worked for wages in 1997 whereas
only forty percent worked for wages
between 1873 and 1973. If the growth
rate of labor productivity (output per
(25) hour of goods and services) in 1997
had equaled its average growth rate
between 1873 and 1973 of more than
two percent, then, given the proportion-
ately larger workforce that existed in
(30) 1997, real GDP per capita in 1997 would
have been higher than it actually was,
since output is a major factor in GDP.
However, because labor productivity
grew by only one percent in 1997, real
(35) GDP per capita grew more slowly in
1997 than it had on average between
1873 and 1973.
According to the passage, which of the following is true of the average rate at which real GDP per capita grew in the twenty-four years immediately before 1997?
这题答案给的D,但小妹觉得B正确。因为最后一句花线的部分讲得很明确阿,应该是选B。不知各位NN怎么看?
我也觉得似乎B正确
欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |