Q41:Magazine Publisher:  Our magazine does not have a liberal bias.  It is true that when a book review we had commissioned last year turned out to express distinctly conservative views, we did not publish it until we had also obtained a second review that took a strongly liberal position.  Clearly, however, our actions demonstrate not a bias in favor of liberal views but rather a commitment to a balanced presentation of diverse opinions.

Determining which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the cogency of the magazine publisher’s response?

1. Whether any other magazines in which the book was reviewed carried more than one review of the book
2. Whether the magazine publishes unsolicited book reviews as well as those that it has commissioned

3. Whether in the event that a first review commissioned by the magazine takes a clearly liberal position the magazine would make any efforts to obtain further reviews

4. Whether the book that was the subject of the two reviews was itself written from a clearly conservative or a clearly liberal point of view
5. Whether most of the readers of the magazine regularly read the book reviews that the magazine publishes

the answer is C,谁帮我分解一下？

我们的杂志没有自由主义的倾向。我们去年发表的对一本书的评论最终表达了保守的观点，我们是在得到了另外一种开放的立场后才出版了评论。然而，我们的行为显示的不是一种支持开放评论的倾向，而是一种展示不同观点的义务。
问：哪一个对评估出版商的话的说服力最有用？

B 杂志是否与那些授权提供的书评一样出版主动提供的书评（无关,文中没有unsolicited book reviews ）

C 杂志发表的第一篇书评站在自由的立场上，它是否努力去得到其他的观点？