Board logo

标题: 请教LSAT test2,sectIV, 12 [打印本页]

作者: greenfloyd    时间: 2002-11-22 11:19     标题: 请教LSAT test2,sectIV, 12

12. “Though they soon will, patients should not have a legal right to see their medical records. As a doctor, I see two reasons for this. First, giving them access will be time-wasting because it will significantly reduce the amount of time that medical staff can spend on more important duties, by forcing them to retrieve and return files. Second, if my experience is anything to go by, no patients are going to ask for access to their records anyway.”
Which one of the following, if true, establishes that the doctor’s second reason does not cancel out the first?
(A) The new law will require that doctors, when seeing a patient in their office, must be ready to produce the patient’s records immediately, not just ready to retrieve them.
(B) The task of retrieving and returning files would fall to the lowest-paid member of a doctor’s office staff.
(C) Any patients who asked to see their medical records would also insist on having details they did not understand explained to them.
(D) The new law does not rule out that doctors may charge patients for extra expenses incurred specifically in order to comply with the new law.
(E) Some doctors have all allowing their patients access to their medical records, but those doctors’ patients took no advantage of this policy.

我不明白doctor的第二个reason 和问题是什么意思,答案选A。请高手点拨一下,谢谢!
[em08]
作者: zyh79    时间: 2002-11-22 12:08

不看纪录的两个原因1:浪费时间 2:没有病人会要求看他们的纪录
问:下面哪个正确,保证第二个原因不会排除第一个原因的可能
    言外之意,第一个原因还是有可能存在的
A:  新法律要求医生必须马上写纪录
    如果一开始纪录都不写,就不会存在浪费时间的问题了




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2