Board logo

标题: [求助]11OG-153 [打印本页]

作者: Economics    时间: 2006-6-24 11:10     标题: [求助]11OG-153

153. Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have made converting solar

energy directly into electricity far more cost-efficient in the last decade. However, the threshold

of economic viability for solar power (that is, the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise

in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants) is

unchanged at thirty-five dollars.

Which of the following, if true, does most to help explain why the increased cost-efficiency

of solar power has not decreased its threshold of economic viability?

(A) The cost of oil has fallen dramatically.

(B) The reduction in the cost of solar-power equipment has occurred despite increased

raw material costs for that equipment.

(C) Technological changes have increased the efficiency of oil-fired power plants.

(D) Most electricity is generated by coal-fired or nuclear, rather than oil-fired, power plants.

(E) When the price of oil increases, reserves of oil not previously worth exploiting become

economically viable.

ANSWER:C

WHY??


作者: luoye1    时间: 2006-6-24 21:15

A  this question was discussed yesterday or two days ago. please check for it.
A1 it was under og10, but I forgot the #. sorry about that.




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2