Board logo

标题: 求助gwd-28-23 [打印本页]

作者: smalllittle    时间: 2006-4-21 07:24     标题: 求助gwd-28-23

: Goronian lawmaker: Goronia’s Cheese Importation
Board, the agency responsible for inspecting all wholesale shipments of cheese
entering Goronia from abroad and rejecting shipments that fail to meet
specified standards, rejects about one percent of the cheese that it inspects.
Since the health consequences and associated costs of not rejecting that one
percent would be negligible, whereas the cost of maintaining the agency is not,
the agency’s cost clearly outweighs the benefits it provides.

Knowing the answer to which of the following would be
most useful in evaluating the lawmaker’s argument?

A: Are any of the types of cheeses that are imported
into Goronia also produced in Goronia?

B: Has the Cheese Importation Board, over the last
several years, reduced its operating costs by eliminating inefficiencies within
the agency itself?

C: Does the possibility of having merchandise rejected
by the Cheese Importation Board deter many cheese exporters from shipping
substandard cheese to Goronia?

D: Are there any exporters of cheese to Goronia whose
merchandise is never rejected by the Cheese Importation Board?

E: How is the cheese rejected by the Cheese
Importation Board disposed of?

完全不知道是什么


作者: smalllittle    时间: 2006-4-22 21:03

没人答只好自己顶了,原文说的是这个agency做的贡献小于maintain他们的费用。所以按c所说Does the possibility of having merchandise rejected
by the Cheese Importation Board deter many cheese exporters from shipping substandard cheese to Goronia?如果成立的话,GCIB的存在是很有意义的,但是要是不成立的,GCIB就没有存在的必要了
还是阅读不过关呀:(主要是这里没读懂Since the health consequences and associated costs of not rejecting that one percent would be negligible, whereas the cost of maintaining the agency is not, 头脑一晕,还以为是句子结构不完整:(





欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2