例2. The presence of microorganisms that produce a toxin cause sweater to turn brownish red, phenomenon known as a red ride. Sea otters do not feed in areas where clams, their main source of food, have become contaminated with this toxin. According to a proposed explanation of the otter’s behavior, the otters sample the clams in a potential feeding area and can taste any toxin in them.

Which of the following, if true, would most strongly indicate that the hypothesis described in the last sentence of the passage of the passage is not correct?

(A) In some of the area where red tides occur, neither clams nor sea otters are indigenous species.

(B) The presence of sea otters in a given area has a significant effect on which other marine organisms are to be found in that areas.

(C) When seawater in an area unaffected by red tide is artificially dyed brownish red, sea otters do not feed on the clams in that area.

(D) If the clams in a given areas are contaminated with toxin, sea otters move to other areas in search of food.

(E) Although very small amounts of the toxin produced during a red tide are not harmful, large doses can be fatal to animals the size of sea otters.

答案C, 我想知道D为啥不行....

我的想法是,如果sea otters知道clams被污染有毒了,不食用clams,如此便不会产生can taste any toxin in them的情形...

请各位牛人帮帮忙~~ 能顺便讲解一下您的解题思路会更好~

BTW,那儿能找到狒狒逻辑总纲的例题讲解? 键连也行..

对逻辑真是没辙了

LZ的想法肯定比较高深，我看了一遍，愣是没有接受下来。

看了2遍，觉得有点意思了~~~

D是不能削弱最后的结论的。因为D就是把The presence of microorganisms that produce a toxin cause sweater to turn brownish red, phenomenon known as a red ride. Sea otters do not feed in areas where clams, their main source of food, have become contaminated with this toxin.换了一种说法。

谢谢解答!!

我的想法很单纯,要指名According to a proposed explanation of the otter’s behavior, the otters sample the clams in a potential feeding area and can taste any toxin in them.有误

而选项D正好可以解释...,虽然它真的是2楼大大所提,只是改写...

这样不行吗?