Board logo

标题: 大全-3-20 [打印本页]

作者: gifile    时间: 2006-4-11 13:26     标题: 大全-3-20

The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment.

When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.


Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?


(A) The proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.


(B) The proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.


(C) If there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominee equal treatment with the first.


(D) The proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawal known.E


(E) If there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.

:(,这个题目的问题部分没看懂。请教大牛给翻译一下并说明答案为什么是E?


作者: huahua115    时间: 2006-4-11 21:22

呵呵,这题你自己举个例子嘛
a同意以前必须知道还有谁被提名(这个人自己也要同意这种提名)
可是那个b呢在自己同意以前又要知道a是否同意这种提名,呵呵,这还搞的好啊
结果就是这种政策根本就没法施行




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2