12. The fewer restrictions
there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise
their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge
less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the
state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements
that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be
lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.

<--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <--[endif]-->

Which of the following, if true, would
most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?

A. The state has recently removed some
other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.

B. The state is unlikely to remove all
of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.

C. Lawyers who do not advertise
generally provide legal services of the same quality as those provided by lawyers
who do advertise.

D. Most lawyers who now specify fee
arrangements in th eir advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were
not required. E

E. Most lawyers who advertise specific
services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.

Therefore, if thestate removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements
that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be
lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.

这里的结论说if remove restrictions such as ....do not specify fee arrangement, costs will be lower.

那么d里面说lawyers即使不要求（也就是remove了restrictions），他们仍然会specify fee
arrangements in their advertisements，那么cost也就不会降低，这不就是削弱了结论么？？？

问题出在哪里？？？，，，，，，