正常发挥,51+34, 710,比我预期要高一点,HOHO~先来JJ吧~

AI

A14. “The most successful structure for any business is one that is clearly hierarchical with clearly defined roles for all levels of employee.”

AA,说起来真巧,昨晚睡觉前练了一篇AA,就是今天考试遇到的~

就是那个Volunteer ambulance service vs. Commercial ambulance services的~

MATHS

那个geese hatched的, 有2/3的hatched，在hatched的里面又有3/4能活一个月以上，活了一个月的有2/5不能活一年以上，这个养殖场有400个活了一年以上,问有多少geese，计不太清楚了，好像是天山的题吧！注意那个划线“not”的就行了。

#代表一种运算，有可能是plus, minus, multiply，问#是哪种运算？（1）2#6=6#2；（2）7*（5+3）<>7*5+7*3，选C.

给了一个坐标系，上面有5个点，每个点的坐标都告诉的，问哪个点符合一个不等式，一个个带进去算就行了

根号X，根号Y都是整数，问一下哪个must be integer？有根号(x+y)，根号(x/y)，根号(XY)。。。。,选根号(XY)

一个BOOKSTORE买书的平均价格是25刀，共卖了150，000本，问卖得最便宜的书的价格？（1）the range of the prices is $6.48(cannot remember);(2)价格低于25到的书是高于25刀的两倍；偶选E

MATHS容我在想想啊~~~

VERBLE

我的阅读一直到第9题才出现，弄得我紧张兮兮的，以为前面做得很烂鬼字不让我做RC呢~汗~阅读我就不写了，跟刚才爱睡觉的猫是一模一样的，有那个什么LONE WOLF，ANTIBODY，米国的经济发展缓慢……

SC，我碰到好几道GWD题目，那个黄蜂了，小汽车省油，科学家ANALYZING DATA GATHERD的……，干菜又看到说黄蜂那个是争议题，我把它贴过来，大家再看看，考频还是蛮高的

Yellow jackets number among the 900 or so species of the world’s social wasps, wasps living in a highly cooperative and organized society where they consist almost entirely of females—the queen and her sterile female workers.

1. wasps living in a highly cooperative and organized society where they consist almost entirely of（they没有指代对象）
2. wasps that live in a highly cooperative and organized society consisting almost entirely of

3. which means they live in a highly cooperative and organized society, almost all （1^st, means放这里意思不对，其次即使意思正确，语法上是修饰复数名词wasps，动词应为mean）
4. which means that their society is highly cooperative, organized, and it is almost entirely

5. living in a society that is highly cooperative, organized, and it consists of almost all (n+ that is adj.不简洁)

CR，也有GWD的，那个黑熊的，

Brochure: Help conserve our city’s water supply. By converting the landscaping in your yard to a water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor water use. A water-conserving landscape is natural and attractive, and it also saves you money.

Criticism: For most people with yards, the savings from converting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of new landscaping, since typically the conversion would save less than twenty dollars on a homeowner’s yearly water bills.

Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism?

1. Even homeowners whose yards do not have（out of scope） water-conserving landscapes can conserve water by installing water-saving devices in their homes.
2. A conventional landscape generally requires a much greater expenditure on fertilizer and herbicide than does a water-conserving landscape.（Conventional landscape会带来除了水费之外的其他成本）

3. A significant proportion of the residents of the city live in buildings that do not have yards.(out of scope)
4. It costs no more to put in water-conserving landscaping than it does to put in conventional landscaping. (strengthen, 其他方面成本一样，再加上criticism所描述的省的水费少，加强)
5. Some homeowners use more water to maintain their yards than they use for all other purposes combined.

不好意思，那花花绿绿的是我自己复习时候用的，顺便粘过来了；

还有一些是当月的jj，什么cancer vs. heartattack了。

记性实在不好，只能先贡献这么多，再想想，再更新……

最后就是跟还在奋斗的同志们说，天道酬勤，这句话永远不会错！付出终会有回报的！大家努力啊~~~