Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservative. However, since there are several wine makers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

a) These wine makers have been able to duplicate teh preservatives effect produced by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic substances to their wine;

b) Not all forms of sulfite are equally likely to produce the allergic reactions.

c) Wine is the only beverage to which sulfites are commonly added;

d) Apart from sulfites, there are no substances commonly present in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction;

e) Sulfites are not natually present in the wines produced by these wine makers in amounts large enough to produce an allegic reaction in someone who drinks these wines.

答案是E，但是我觉得选D，理由是它是建立在酒里面没有其他东西引起过敏反应。而答案E，跟他们生产的AMOUNT有什么关系呢？

请指教！

当然是E。

题目中说许多人对certain sulfites过敏，这其中包括wine maker往酒里添加的preserevative。结论是，不加这些preservative,就没事了。这不就是说没有其它的sulfites吗？E是说酒自己产生的sulfites.....

e) Sulfites are not natually present in the wines produced by these wine makers in amounts large enough to produce an allegic reaction in someone who drinks these wines.

E答案究竟是什么意思呀？好像读不明白！请求帮助！

wine maker生产的酒中，sulfites不会天然的存在达到一个足以使喝这种酒的人过敏的量。