Board logo

标题: 大全sectin2--5 [打印本页]

作者: bobiouou    时间: 2005-12-6 19:59     标题: 大全sectin2--5

请大家看这个题目:

The city’s public transportation system should be removed from the jurisdiction of the municipal government, which finds it politically impossible either to raise fares or to institute cost-saving reductions in service. If public transportation were handled by a private firm, profits would be vigorously pursued, thereby eliminating the necessity for covering operating costs with government funds.

The statements above best support the conclusion that

(A) the private firms that would handle public transportation would have experience in the transportation industry

(B) political considerations would not prevent private firms from ensuring that revenues cover operating costs

(C) private firms would receive government funding if it were needed to cover operating costs

(D) the public would approve the cost-cutting actions taken by the private firm

(E) the municipal government would not be resigned to accumulating merely enough income to cover costs

答案:B

怎么看得我一片迷糊啊?B和题目之间的逻辑关系是怎么样的呢?

盼望牛牛解答。


作者: thinkers    时间: 2005-12-7 07:22

题目说的是the municipal government finds it politically impossible either to raise fares or to institute cost-saving reductions in service即因为政治原因所以入不敷出,但又说如果public transportation were handled by a private firm就不会有问题。

所以结论就是private firm不会受政治影响,也就是B说的


作者: bobiouou    时间: 2005-12-8 04:17

呵呵,谢谢解答。

看了解答一下子明白过来了。






欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2