1. A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and functional for public use, must be unobtrusive, taking second place to the total environment. Modern architects, plagued by egoism, have violated this precept. They have let their strong personalities take over their work, producing buildings that are not functional for public use.
Which one of the statements below follows logically from the statements in the passage?
(A) Unobtrusive architecture is both inviting and functional.
(B) Modern architects who let their strong personalities take over their work produce buildings that are not unobtrusive.
(C) An architect with a strong personality cannot produce buildings that functional well for the public.
(D) A work of architecture that takes second place to the environment functions well for public use.
(E) A work of architecture cannot simultaneously express its architect’s personality and be functional for public use.
这是成为inviting and functional for public 的前提：must be unobtrusive, taking second place to the total environment.（１）
作者说现在的buildings are not functional for public use.
所以就缺少（１）
Ａ肯定不对，关系倒了，Ｃ也不好题干中没有提到
Ｄ题干同样没有提到作者: 1stzhang 时间: 2002-11-10 13:22
a:因果倒置。逻辑错。
b:双重否定表肯定。
c:混淆错。
d and e 范围错。作者: nil1989 时间: 2002-11-11 14:43
ETS真狡猾，其实很简单的题目
欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/)
