国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA

标题: 大全-19-9 [打印本页]

作者: summergal 时间: 2013-6-27 20:17 标题: 大全-19-9

Walter: A copy of an artwork should be worth exactly what the original is worth if the two works are visually indistinguishable. After all, if the two works are visually indistinguishable, they have all the same qualities, and if they have all the same qualities, their prices should be equal.

Marissa: How little you understand art! Even if someone could make a perfect copy that is visually indistinguishable from the original, the copy would have a different history and hence not have all the same qualities as the original.

Marissa uses which of the following techniques in attempting to refute Walter’s argument?

(A) Attacking his assumption that the price of an artwork indicates its worth

(B) Raising a point that would undermine one of the claims on which his conclusion is based

(C) Questioning his claim that a perfect copy of a work of art would be visually indistinguishable from the original

(D) Giving reason to believe that Walter is unable to judge the quality of a work of art because of his inadequate understanding of the history of art（B）

(E) Proposing alternative criteria for determining whether two works of art are visually indistinguishable

我选了d，我觉得the copy would have a different history and hence not have all the same qualities as the original是d中的抽象词reason，可是b中的抽象词his claim我没有找到对应的。我觉得只有W发表过claim，M并没有发表过claim阿！

请指教！谢谢！

作者: atlantiswind 时间: 2013-6-28 06:20

首先，需要读懂文章的意思，而不是专注于一些所谓的解题技巧。比如文章中，男生的结论是头一句话，然后后面的两句都是claim，一是外表不可区分，则质量一样；其次，质量一样，价格就一样。女生的反驳在于说明，即使外观无法区分，但真品和赝品的质量绝对不同，因此是反驳了一个claim。

作者: summergal 时间: 2013-7-1 05:57

xiexie

是不是d选项有一点人身攻击的意味？

作者: hgjtytryr 时间: 2013-7-1 20:59

Walter: A copy of an artwork should be worth exactly what the original is worth if the two works ...
summergal 发表于 2013-6-27 20:17

9. Marissa uses which of the following techniques in attempting to refute Walter’s argument?
(A) Attacking his assumption that the price of an artwork indicates its worth
(B) Raising a point that would undermine one of the claims on which his conclusion is based
W认为qualities一样，所以prices一样。而M指出qualities不一样，削弱假设，进而攻击结论
(C) Questioning his claim that a perfect copy of a work of art would be visually indistinguishable from the original
(D) Giving reason to believe that Walter is unable to judge the quality of a work of art because of his inadequate understanding of the history of art
不只是“历史”（B）
(E) Proposing alternative criteria for determining whether two works of art are visually indistinguishable

作者: xuyuanwai 时间: 2013-7-3 05:53

类比推理，第一个人认为视觉上一样，所以都一样，价格也一样

要削弱，就要说两者不相似不可比，第二个人正好说了就算视觉一样，也有其他地方不一样

所以通过削弱他的base削弱了推理

欢迎光临国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/)