Board logo

标题: 大全-I-18 [打印本页]

作者: applebees    时间: 2005-10-17 06:32     标题: 大全-I-18

18. Critics of sales seminars run by outside consultants point out that since 1987, revenues of vacuum cleaner companies whose employees attended consultant-led seminars were lower than revenues of vacuum cleaner companies whose employees did not attend such seminars. The critics charge that for vacuum cleaner companies, the sales seminars are ill conceived and a waste of money.
Which of the following, if true, is the most effective challenge to the critics of sales seminars?
(A) Those vacuum cleaner companies whose sales were highest prior to 1987 are the only companies that did not send employees to the seminars.
(B) Vacuum cleaner companies that have sent employees to sales seminars since 1987 experienced a greater drop in sales than they had prior to 1987.
(C) The cost of vacuum cleaner sales seminars run by outside consultants has risen dramatically since 1987.
(D) The poor design of vacuum cleaner sales seminars is not the only reason for their ineffectiveness.
(E) Since 1987, sales of vacuum cleaners have risen twenty percent.
请问答案A怎么解释? 怎么这么别扭,好像说倒了. 多谢各位NN!
作者: thinkers    时间: 2005-10-17 13:13

原文的意思就是参加了培训的不如没有参加培训的,所以培训没用找出一个削弱
a说的就是这个没有培训的厂呢以前就很赚钱,所以现在参加培训的厂呢没有它赚钱也不奇怪,但是培训可能使得他们的差距缩小了啊,这就可以说明培训还是有用的,这就是对原文的削弱了


作者: monicars    时间: 2005-10-17 20:22

看来看去还是觉得A不对是说倒了,大家帮忙看看!




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2