Most employees in the computer industry movefrom company to company, changing jobs several times in their
careers. However, Summit Computers is known throughout the industry for retaining its employees. Summit
credits its success in retaining employees to its informal, nonhierarchicalwork environment.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports Summit's explanation of its success in retaining
employees?
(A) Some people employed in the computer industry change jobs if they become bored with their
current projects.
(B) Ahierarchical work environment hinders the cooperative exchange of ideas that computer industry
employees consider necessary for their work.
(C) Many of Summit's senior employees had previously worked at only one other computer company.
(D) In a nonhierarchical work environment, people avoid behavior that might threaten group harmony and
thus avoid discussing with their colleagues any dissatisfaction they might have with their jobs.
(E) The cost of living near Summit is relatively low compared to areas in which some other computer
companies are located.
好吧，这是一个老题，看过了各种解释，说一下自己的理解，请教一下诸位到底哪里不到位
首先，argument是informal, nonhierarchical work environment帮助Summit留住了员工，这一点应该没有问题吧？然后 B和D各种解释我都基本同意，唯一的问题是，B说是hierarchical work environment会妨害交流导致员工无法完成工作，但是完全没说nonhierarchical不会啊？ 还是说，在逻辑题里，对于A和非A的对比，A的弱点非A一定没有？ 这个不太合理吧？ 另外一个关于B的问题，B的逻辑链应该是这样的hierarchical work environment-> no exchange of ideas-> couldn't do work-> employee to quite,这里面最后一环完全是假设吧？好像既不是充分也不是必要？为什么这个是成立的？最后假设OG的权威性不容质疑，那我我可不可以这么理解，如果argument是A can do B because C, 那么证明non-C will cause A couldn't do B就是加强?作者: psycheps 时间: 2013-5-23 19:03
