43. Installing scrubbers in smokestacks and switching tocleaner-burning fuel are the two methods available toNorthern Power for reducing harmful emissions fromits plants. Scrubbers will reduce harmful emissionsmore than cleaner-burning fuels will. Therefore, byinstalling scrubbers, Northern Power will be doing themost that can be done to reduce harmful emissionsfrom its plants.[c1]
Which of the following is an assumption on which theargument depends?
(A)[c2] Switching to cleaner-burning fuel will not bemore expensive than installing scrubbers.
(B[c3]) Northern Power can choose from among variouskinds of scrubbers, some of which are moreeffective than others.
(C) Northern Power is not necessarily[c4] committed toreducing harmful emissions from its plants.
(D)[c5] Harmful emissions from Northern Power’splants cannot be reduced more by using bothmethods together than by the installation ofscrubbers alone.D
(E)[c6] Aside from harmful emissions from thesmokestacks of its plants, the activities of
Northern Power do not cause significant airpollution.
求问:C选项OG上的解释是“Even if the company is full committed to reducing harmful emissions, it could be that installing scrubbers is the most it can do to reduce harmful emissions "
这个解释怎么理解呀?特别是"full committed to "
欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |