Board logo

标题: gwd-27-20 [打印本页]

作者: anilolive    时间: 2013-4-22 07:12     标题: gwd-27-20

Q20:Critics of certain pollution-control regulations have claimed that the money spent over the last decade in order to reduce emissions of carbon monoxide and of volatile organic compounds has been wasted.
The evidence they offer in support of this claim might appear compelling:
despite the money spent, annual emissions of these pollutants have been increasing steadily.
This evidence is far from adequate, however, since over the last decade a substantial number of new industrial facilities that emit these pollutants have been built.

In the reasoning given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A     The first identifies a claim that the reasoning seeks to show is false; the second is evidence that has been cited by others in support of that claim.


B     The first identifies a claim that the reasoning seeks to show is false; the second is a position for which the reasoning seeks to provide support.

C     The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is a position for which the reasoning seeks to provide support.

D     The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is evidence used to support the reasoning’s contention.


E     The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is evidence that has been used to support that position.


答案D,我觉得A更有道理,因为the second是对 the first的反驳,而不是support 。


作者: cherryser    时间: 2013-4-22 19:27

A: the second is evidence that has been cited by others in support of that claim. 说的不正是support吗?

D: the second is evidence used to support the reasoning’s contention.  second是对reasoning的support. reasoning是对 the first的反驳. 不正是the second是对 the first的反驳吗?
作者: anilolive    时间: 2013-4-23 18:48

谢谢啦
作者: Knightll    时间: 2013-4-24 19:18


   2    The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is evidence that has been used to support that position.

d 和  e 有什么区别 ?


作者: fatmoe    时间: 2013-4-25 08:08

A: the second is evidence that has been cited by others in support of that claim. 说的不正是support吗 ...
cherryser 发表于 2013-4-22 19:27



不完全對.... A support 的claim 也是反對the first 的: ..."a claim that the reasoning seeks to show is false" . 看看A 臫opway的差異在於A. ..the second is "evidence" that has been cited by others in support of that "claim". (反對the first主張claim)


D. ..the second is "evidence" used to support the "reasoning’s contention"(反對支持the first原因)
作者: waytouing    时间: 2013-4-26 06:34

D20. GWD27-Q20:

Critics of certain pollution-control regulations have claimed that the money spent over the last decade in order to reduce emissions of carbon monoxide and of volatile organic compounds has been wasted.
The evidence they offer in support of this claim might appear compelling:
despite the money spent, annual emissions of these pollutants have been increasing steadily.
This evidence is far from adequate, however, since over the last decade a substantial number of new industrial facilities that emit these pollutants have been built.

In the reasoning given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?



D: The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is evidence used to support the reasoning’s contention.




没看出来第二个bf怎么支持第一个结论的理由的

作者: TerraceHo    时间: 2013-4-27 06:40

E为什么错?
作者: zhanghaolin    时间: 2013-4-29 06:57

D: The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is evidence used to support the reasoning’s contention.
D后半部分准确的说明second是支持作者的结论(争论Critics的claim的准确性),而不是支持first position(Critics的结论)
作者: zhanghaolin    时间: 2013-5-2 06:21

比较一下,d和e前半部分完全一样

注意first postion指的是critics的结论,即作者反对的结论

那么e中说second用来支持first postion(作者反对的结论)显然就错了,因为second是用来支持作者自己的观点的:)
作者: cynthia129    时间: 2013-5-2 19:00

比较一下,d和e前半部分完全一样

注意first postion指的是critics的结论,即作者反对的结论

那么e中说 ...
zhanghaolin 发表于 2013-5-2 06:21



first不是作者反对的,只是认为inadequate。后面观点是补充first position的。
vote fore e。因为first position后面的evidence都是为了support或者补充使它adequate的。




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2