Board logo

标题: 费费逻辑 121,已解决 [打印本页]

作者: kkfrancais    时间: 2013-2-14 12:55     标题: 费费逻辑 121,已解决

121. Observatory director: Some say that funding the mega telescope will benefit only the astronomers who will work with it. This dangerous point of view, applied to the work of Maxwell, Newton, or Einstein, would have satisfied their research and deprived the world of beneficial applications, such as the development of radio, that followed from that research.



If the statements above are put forward as an argument in favor of development of the mega telescope, which one of the following is the strongest criticism of that argument?



A.It appeals to the authority of experts who cannot have known all the issues involved in construction of the megatelescope.

B.It does not identify those opposed to development of the megatelescope.

C.It launches a personal attack on opponents of the megatelescope by accusing them of having a dangerous point of view.

D.It does not distinguish between the economic and the intellectual senses of “benefit”.

E.It does not show that the proposed mega telescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications.



参考思路:指出推论错误。


(E) It does not show that the proposed mega telescope research is worthy of comparison with that of eminent scientists in its potential for applications.
举的例子不具有可比性



其实我是题目看不明白。。。谁能帮忙分析一下思路?~

作者: zhima427    时间: 2013-2-15 13:47

有的人说投资在MT上只会对那些将来要用MT的航天员有用, 这个危险的观点 如果放在M N E 这些人的工作上 将会使他们满足于他们的研究 并且把一些紧接在这些研究之后的有益的工作剥夺 比如说R的发展

文章的逻辑不是一个完全意义上的对比
作者: kkfrancais    时间: 2013-2-16 21:34

E项的话,只是单单说明了district可以在没有完全垮掉的情况下缩减一些,但是这样的话有可能是因为district有一定的缓冲能力,以至于将来还会REBOUND。我觉得这项对原文结论的成立有可能起到削弱的作用,或者无关,相比较之下,A项更加的能说明问题。
作者: kkfrancais    时间: 2013-2-18 09:24

LS的解释好通俗易懂!!谢谢了@




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2