标题: GWD3-Q17 [打印本页]
作者: Ferris1992 时间: 2013-1-24 07:35 标题: GWD3-Q17
GWD3-Q17:
Brochure:
Help conserve our city’s water supply.
By converting the landscaping in your yard to a water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor water use.
A water-conserving landscape is natural and attractive, and it also saves you money.
Criticism:
For most people with yards, the savings from converting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of new landscaping, since typically the conversion would save less than twenty dollars on a homeowner’s yearly water bills.
Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism?
A.
Even homeowners whose yards do not have water-conserving landscapes can conserve water by installing water-saving devices in their homes.
B.
A conventional landscape generally requires a much greater expenditure on fertilizer and herbicide than does a water-conserving landscape.
C.
A significant proportion of the residents of the city live in buildings that do not have yards.
A.
It costs no more to put in water-conserving landscaping than it does to put in conventional landscaping.
D.
Some homeowners use more water to maintain their yards than they use for all other purposes combined.
哪位大侠能给解释一下吗？正解是B我选A…… 这题的意思我没看太明白 但半猜半推地选了A
作者: saintaa 时间: 2013-1-24 21:09
问题是反驳Criticism,支持Brochure
B选项反驳了Criticism 因为 Critism说新的landscape不一定省钱 Brochure
说这个东西节水所以省钱
B选项说了 传统的风景比新风景在施肥和除草方面花费更大 支持了Brochure
省钱这一说法
作者: Ferris1992 时间: 2013-1-25 06:58
哦 了了~ 我好像是题没看懂…… 哈哈 谢谢 =）
作者: ashleyyuan 时间: 2013-1-26 07:04
问一下，D选项为什么不对呢？
作者: wojiaodubing 时间: 2013-1-28 06:47
D在程度上不如B，一个是no more,一个是much greater
| 欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) |
Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |