56. The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising
of legal services, the more lawyers there are who
advertise their services, and the lawyers who
advertise a specific service usually charge less for
that service than the lawyers who do not advertise.
Therefore, if the state removes any of its current
restrictions, such as the one against advertisements
that do not specify fee arrangements, overall
consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state
retains its current restrictions.
If the statements above are true, which of the
following must be true?
(A) Some lawyers who now advertise will charge
more for specific services if they do not have to
specify fee arrangements in the advertisements.
(B) More consumers will use legal services if there
are fewer restrictions on the advertising of legal
services.
(C) If the restriction against advertisements that do
not specify fee arrangements is removed, more
lawyers will advertise their services.
(D) If more lawyers advertise lower prices for
specific services, some lawyers who do not
advertise will also charge less than they
currently charge for those services.
(E) If the only restrictions on the advertising of legal
services were those that apply to every type of
advertising, most lawyers would advertise their
services.
答案选c为什么a选项中og说The lawyers may charge more,but nothing in the passage rules out the possibility that no lawyer will charge more
这题主要是讨论律师打不打广告，有多少律师打广告。
不是律师打了广告后收费变多变少的问题，题中根本没有提供足够的信息来推出A, 所以OG说The lawyers may charge more,but nothing in the passage rules out the possibility that no lawyer will charge more作者: callmesoli 时间: 2012-12-21 06:50
就是说是无关咯，按照这样我就懂了，谢谢帮我解答
欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/)
