题目的逻辑关系是知道的.可是答案的逻辑关系却怎么也想不清楚.请那位大牛指导一下

og 54

It is true that it is against international law to sell plutonium to countries that do not yet have nucleear weapons. But if United States companies do not do so, companies in other countries will.

which of the following is most like the argument above in its logical structure?

Answer is D It is true that it is againstt the law to burglarize people's homes. But someone else certernly would have burglarized that house if the defendant had not done so first.

(D) It is true that it is against the law to burglarize people’s homes. But someone else certainly would have burglarized that house if the defendant had not done so first.

文章讲的是某个行为是犯法的,但是要是你不作别人就会做.

原文和D都是这个意思：

做某件事是违法的，但如果被告没这末做，其他人当然会这末做。

I know the passage means one's behavior is against the law,and the one excuses that if he or she did not do that others would do that.

And D show the same obviously use "someone esle would....".