Current feminist theory, in validating women’s own
stories of their experience, has encouraged scholars
of women’s history to view the use of women’s oral
narratives as the methodology, next to the use of
women’s written autobiography, that brings historians
closest to the “reality” of women’s lives. Such
narratives, unlike most standard histories, represent
experience from the perspective of women, affi rm
the importance of women’s contributions, and furnish
present-day women with historical continuity that is
essential to their identity, individually and collectively.
Scholars of women’s history should, however, be
as cautious about accepting oral narratives at face
value as they already are about written memories.
Oral narratives are no more likely than are written
narratives to provide a disinterested commentary on
events or people. Moreover, the stories people tell to
explain themselves are shaped by narrative devices
and storytelling conventions, as well as by other
cultural and historical factors, in ways that the
storytellers may be unaware of. The political rhetoric
of a particular era, for example, may influence
women’s interpretations of the signifi cance of their
experience. Thus a woman who views the Second
World War as pivotal in increasing the social
acceptance of women’s paid work outside the home
may reach that conclusion partly and unwittingly
because of wartime rhetoric encouraging a positive
view of women’s participation in such work.
39. Which of the following best describes the function of the last sentence of the passage?
(A) It describes an event that historians view as crucial in recent women’s history.
(B) It provides an example of how political rhetoric may influence the interpretations of experience reported in women’s oral narratives.
(C) It provides an example of an oral narrative that inaccurately describes women’s experience
during a particular historical period.
(D) It illustrates the point that some women are more aware than others of the social forces that shape their oral narratives.
(E) It identifies the historical conditions that led to the social acceptance of women’s paid work outside the home.
这题的C想不明白为什么错了?作者: liuqiaoqi77 时间: 2012-10-31 20:18
however : cautious about accepting oral narratives (段意)
(支持1)→:Oral narratives are no more likely than are written narratives to provide a disinterested commentary
(支持2)→: shaped themselves (对应c中:inaccurately )---------- → (解释说明“支持2”)for example:babababa~
切记一点,politic 和 thus是在for example里面的因果,所以他们都算是for example的~~~作者: hoteldeville 时间: 2012-11-2 06:38
This question requires recognizing how a
particular part of the passage is related to the
overall reasoning in the passage. The first
paragraph introduces a methodology and
describes the methodology's appeal. The second
paragraph then raises concerns about the use of
the methodology, drawing attention to the
cultural and historical bias that may be present in
oral narratives. In line 21, the passage refers
specifically to the influence political rhetoric may
have on a woman's understanding of her
experience. In the final sentence, the passage
provides a specific hypothetical example of a
woman at the time of the Second World War to
illustrate this concern.
A The last sentence employs a hypothetical
example and does not describe a particular
event as being important to historians.
B Correct. After contendingthat political
rhetoric may influence oral narratives, the
passage uses the example of the Second
World War in the final sentence to support
this claim.
C The last sentence does not provide a
particular example of an oral narrative.
D The passage does not claim that some
women are more aware than others of the
social forces that may bear on them.
E The passage does not claim that social
conditions during the Second World War
led to acceptance of women in the
workplace.
说实话,看完OG对于C项的解释依然不明白!
欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/)