Board logo

标题: 可以幫我解釋一下嗎? [打印本页]

作者: buaagonggan    时间: 2012-10-14 07:14     标题: 可以幫我解釋一下嗎?


Bill: Smoke-detecting fire alarms can save lives. I believe that every apartment in this city should be required by law to be equipped with a smoke detector.

Joe: I disagree with your proposal. Smoke detectors are just as important for safety in private houses as they are in apartment.

From this exchange, it can be inferred that Joe has interpreted Bill’s statement to mean that

(A) the city should be responsible for providing smoke detectors for apartments

(B) residences outside the city should not be equipped with smoke detectors

(C) only apartments should be equipped with smoke detectors

(D) the risk of fire is not as great in private houses as it is in apartmentsC

(E) the rate of death by fire is unusually high in the city in question

請幫我用中文解釋一下謝謝

作者: Hamburger530    时间: 2012-10-14 21:35

1。J是反对B的建议,所以选项必须是J后面的话能起WEAKEN作用的。J后面的话只能反对C,D。排除ABE

2。J反对的是建议,D不是建议。剩C
作者: buaagonggan    时间: 2012-10-15 06:35

對不起我還是不懂
我怎麼覺得答案應該是"not"only apartments should be equipped with smoke detectors
joe的意思應該是不光只有apartment需要smoke-detecting,house也需要
可以幫我解決困惑嗎?
還是我誤解意思了
作者: Hamburger530    时间: 2012-10-15 21:11

“我怎麼覺得答案應該是"not"only apartments should be equipped with smoke detectors
joe的意思應該是不光只有apartment需要smoke-detecting,house也需要”这层意思从何而来。JOE只说 他不同意B的建议,私房和公寓的Smoke detectors 一样重要,除此之外什麽也没说。
作者: WayneCH2012    时间: 2012-10-16 06:17

Bill说每个公寓都应装smoke detector,说明Bill认为smoke detector对公寓是重要的.但Joe说不同意Bill的说法,说detector对私人住所与公寓都很重要,言下之意就是Joe以为Bill说detector对私人住所不重要,私人住所不需要装detector,只有公寓要装。
这样应该明白了吧。
作者: 风行GMR    时间: 2012-10-16 21:04

espirit的说明很详细
题目其实是问“JOE所理解的BILL的意思”
同样的问法还有一个题:大全-B-17




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2