Board logo

标题: GWD 8-Q38又到逻辑题不懂,求解~ [打印本页]

作者: purpleelf    时间: 2012-8-31 06:56     标题: GWD 8-Q38又到逻辑题不懂,求解~

Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wild.The countries in which the tigers' habitats are located are currently debating joint legislation that would ban tiger hunting.Thus, if these countries can successfully enforce this legislation, the survival of tigers in the wild will be ensured.



The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument

A. assumes without sufficient warrant that a ban on tiger hunting could be successfully enforced

B. considers the effects of hunting on tigers without also considering the effects of hunting on other endangered animal species

C. fails to take into account how often tiger hunters are unsuccessful in their attempts to kill tigers

D. neglects to consider the results of governmental attempts in the past to limit tiger hunting

E. takes the removal of an impediment to the tigers' survival as a guarantee of their survival

答案是E,可是为什么看不懂呢??

作者: irenechl    时间: 2012-8-31 21:29

除非猎杀老虎减少,否则老虎不久将灭绝。现在,在老虎聚居地的国家正

在讨论联合宪法,以此来禁止猎杀老虎。那么,如果这个国家能成功实施法

律,那么老虎肯定能生存下来。

问,文中所给出的推理最容易被削弱的是在下面哪个事实?

1:毫无足够的证据来证明禁止猎杀的法律能被有效实施 (没有做够的证据,

但是不代表就不是,其实这个是个含糊不清的信息,不足以来判断)

2:只考虑猎杀对于老虎的影响,但是没有考虑猎杀对于其他动物的影响 (这

个不削弱本文的结论,因为文章只有结论关于老虎的)

3:没有考虑猎杀不成功的频率 (和文章要求禁止猎杀,其实有关,因为不

成功频率越高,禁止猎杀的法律制定本身就没有意义,但是对于最终的结论

法律实施,老虎存活的事实没有关系)

4:没有考虑以往过去政府企图限制的效果(这个是对法律实施的效率提出疑

问,但是文章已经说了,if can successfully enforce, then....那么就把

效率低的可能性给否定了)

5:把阻止老虎生存的障碍去除就保证老虎能生存的可能。 (其实说明除了

那些障碍错误的理解为唯一的障碍)打个比方姚明2.12,所以他能扣篮。那

么如果我成功长到2.12,那么我也能扣篮。身高并非唯一的原因。 和这个题

目意思一样。
作者: purpleelf    时间: 2012-9-2 07:32

thank you so much!




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2