标题: OG 蓝皮 P40 请教各位意见 [打印本页] 作者: torresAing 时间: 2012-8-5 20:25 标题: OG 蓝皮 P40 请教各位意见
题：investments in service are comparable to investments in production and distribution in terms of ---
A tangibility of benefits that they tend to confer
C basis on which they need to be weighed
原文：investments in service, like those in production and distribution must be balance against other types of investments on the basis of direct, tangible benefits such as cost reduction and increased revenues.
根据原文的这句话，我觉得A更正确，无法得出C选项？作者: LuckyStars 时间: 2012-8-6 06:30
加个括号，试翻译
investments in service, like those in production and distribution must be balance against other types of investments （on the basis of direct, tangible benefits such as cost reduction and increased revenues.）
根据OG解释，我觉得关键在于问题！！
题目问：服务投资“能够，可以，有能力”与生产、配送投资相比的原因是什么，即，为什么二者可以比？二者的可比性是如何产生，如何实现的？-----C答：是通过它们所需要加以权衡的基础来实现比较的。
包括我理解成的是：二者是通过什么来“直接进行”对比的。是用什么“手段，方法，方式”来比？------A答：是用tangibility of the benefits来进行比较的。
原文相应部分：
The fact that superior service can generate a competitive advantage for a company does not mean that every attempt at improving service will create such an advantage. Investments in service, like those in production and distribution, must be balanced against other types of investments on the basis of direct, tangible benefits such as cost reduction and increased revenues.
上面这段就是原文的相关内容，我也不明白为什么A不对。
原文明明很明确的提到了must be balanced against ... on the basis of tangible benefits.
即“in service的投资就像in production and distribution的投资一样，必须在tangible benefits的基础上与其他投资进行平衡、权衡”
而问题问的也是
“把in service的投资与in production and distribution的投资相比较”
“in terms of”在下面哪个方面
