Board logo

标题: [求助]GWD 12-8 [打印本页]

作者: grasses    时间: 2005-9-16 12:57     标题: [求助]GWD 12-8


Acting on the recommen-

dation of a British government

committee investigating the

Line high incidence in white lead

(5) factories of illness among

employees, most of whom

were women, the Home Sec-

retary proposed in 1895 that

Parliament enact legislation

(10) that would prohibit women from

holding most jobs in white lead

factories. Although the

Women’s Industrial Defence

Committee (WIDC), formed

(15) in 1892 in response to earlier

legislative attempts to restrict

women’s labor, did not dis-

count the white lead trade’s

potential health dangers, it

(20) opposed the proposal, view-

ing it as yet another instance

of limiting women’s work

opportunities. Also opposing

the proposal was the Society

(25) for Promoting the Employment

of Women (SPEW), which

attempted to challenge it by

investigating the causes of ill-

ness in white lead factories.

(30) SPEW contended, and WIDC

concurred, that controllable

conditions in such factories

were responsible for the devel-

opment of lead poisoning.

(35) SPEW provided convincing

evidence that lead poisoning

could be avoided if workers

were careful and clean and

if already extant workplace

(40) safety regulations were

stringently enforced. How-

ever, the Women’s Trade

Union League (WTUL), which

had ceased in the late 1880’s

(45) to oppose restrictions on

women’s labor, supported the

eventually enacted proposal,

in part because safety regu-

lations were generally not

(50) being enforced in white lead

factories, where there were no

unions (and little prospect of

any) to pressure employers to

comply with safety regulations.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q8:

Which of the following, if true, would most clearly support the contention attributed to SPEW in lines 30-34 (“SPEW contended … lead poisoning”) ?

A. Those white lead factories that most strongly enforced regulations concerning worker safety and hygiene had the lowest incidences of lead poisoning among employees.

B. The incidence of lead poisoning was much higher among women who worked in white lead factories than among women who worked in other types of factories.

C. There were many household sources of lead that could have contributed to the incidence of lead poisoning among women who also worked outside the home in the late nineteenth century.

D. White lead factories were more stringent than were certain other types of factories in their enforcement of workplace safety regulations.

E. Even brief exposure to the conditions typically found in white lead factories could cause lead poisoning among factory workers.

Answer: A

不明白? 我选B

thank you


作者: thinkers    时间: 2005-9-17 14:19

Also opposing

the proposal was the Society

(25) for Promoting the Employment

of Women (SPEW), which

attempted to challenge it by

investigating the causes of ill-

ness in white lead factories.

(30) SPEW contended, and WIDC

concurred, that controllable

conditions in such factories

were responsible for the devel-

opment of lead poisoning.

(35) SPEW provided convincing

evidence that lead poisoning

could be avoided if workers

were careful and clean and

if already extant workplace

(40) safety regulations were

stringently enforced.

A. Those white lead factories that most strongly enforced

regulations concerning worker safety and hygiene had the lowest

incidences of lead poisoning among employees.证明了spew的观点。

B. The incidence of lead poisoning was much higher among women who

worked in white lead factories than among women who worked in other

types of factories.无此内容的比较。

选A。


作者: liuliyun    时间: 2005-9-19 06:57

ding !!!!




欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2