Q31:

Studies in restaurants show that the tips left by customers who pay their bill in cash tend to be larger when the bill is presented on a tray that bears a credit-card logo. Consumer psychologists hypothesize that simply seeing a credit-card logo makes many credit-card holders willing to spend more because it reminds them that their spending power exceeds the cash they have immediately available.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the psychologists’ interpretation of the studies?

1. The effect noted in the studies is not limited to patrons who have credit cards.
2. Patrons who are under financial pressure from their credit-card obligations tend to tip less when presented with a restaurant bill on a tray with credit-card logo than when the tray has no logo.
3. In virtually all of the cases in the studies, the patrons who paid bills in cash did not possess credit cards.
4. In general, restaurant patrons who pay their bills in cash leave larger tips than do those who pay by credit card.
5. The percentage of restaurant bills paid with given brand of credit card increases when that credit card’s logo is displayed on the tray with which the bill is prepared.
6. 答案是B,但是我觉得B好象说反了了啊. 题目说credit-card logo使消费者多付小费,B项却说没有logo的时候消费付的多-----怎么还能是support呢?!

另外,我离考试时间只有10天了.在CR部分,我把OG作了3遍,补充材料,费费135,大全中的GMAT部分以及前5套的LSAT-CR全部完成了------ 做的题目总算有1000左右吧------ 但不知道最后10天怎么有效的整理思路了:还要再做专题训练么?还是回归OG,找题感?? 希望得到指教----- 很需要也很重视大家的意见!! 谢谢了~~~~~~

1。该题已讨论过，请搜索。原文意思为见到信用卡的LOGO会影响人的行

为。B也是这个意思。这是推理方式上的加强。

2。建议看熟OG的解释。我对逻辑做过一个小结，见“逻辑体的大体思路”，

不只对你是否有帮助。