标题: 质疑GWD-12-27 [打印本页]
作者: pye348789 时间: 2012-6-8 21:50 标题: 质疑GWD-12-27
Years before the advent of plate
tectonics―the widely accepted theory,
developed in the mid-1960’s, the holds
Line that the major features of Earth’s surface
(5) are created by the horizontal motions
of Earth’s outer shell, or lithosphere―
a similar theory was rejected by the
geological community. In 1912, Alfred
Wegener proposed, in a widely debated
(10) theory that came to be called continental
drift, that Earth’s continents were mobile.
To most geologists today, Wegener’s
The origin of Continents and Oceans
appears an impressive and prescient
(15) document, containing several of the
essential presumptions underlying plate
tectonics theory: the horizontal mobility
of pieces of Earth’s crust; the essential
difference between oceanic and conti-
(20) nental crust; and a causal connection
between horizontal displacements and
the formation of mountain chains. Yet
despite the considerable overlap
between Wegener’s concepts and the
(25) later widely embraced plate tectonics
theory, and despite the fact that conti-
nental drift theory presented a possible
solution to the problem of the origin of
mountains at a time when existing expla-
(30) nations were seriously in doubt, in its
day Wegener’s theory was rejected
by the vast majority of geologists.
Most geologists and many historians
today believe that Wegener’s theory
(35) was rejected because of its lack of an
adequate mechanical basis. Stephen
Jay Gould, for example, argues that
continental drift theory was rejected
because it did not explain how continents
(40) could move through an apparently solid
oceanic floor. However, as Anthony
Hallam has pointed out, many scientific
phenomena, such as the ice ages, have
been accepted before they could be fully
(45) explained. The most likely cause for the
rejection of continental drift―a cause
that has been largely ignored because
we consider Wegener’s theory to have
been validated by the theory of plate
(50) tectonics―is the nature of the evidence
that was put forward to support it. Most
of Wegener’s evidence consisted of
homologies—similarities of patterns and
forms based on direct observations of
(55) rocks in the field, supported by the use
of hammers, hand lenses, and field note-
books. In contrast, the data supporting
plate tectonics were impressively
geophysical—instrumental determinations
(60) of the physical properties of Earth gar-
nered through the use of seismographs,
magnetometers, and computers.
Q27:
It can be inferred from the passage that geologists today would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about Wegener’s The Origin of Continents and Oceans?
A It was a worthy scientific effort that was ahead of its time.
B It was based on evidence that was later disproved.
C It was directly responsible for the acceptance of the theory of plate tectonics.
D It has been disproved by continental drift theory.
E It misrepresented how horizontal displacements cause the formation of mountain chains.
答案是A，但个人觉得应该是C，文中第13行到第17行：Wegener’s The origin of Continents and Oceans appears an impressive and prescient document, containing several of the essential presumptions underlying plate tectonics theory
大家觉得呢？
作者: cckjenius 时间: 2012-6-9 09:19
C 是错的。作者说W的理论containing several of the essential presumptions underlying plate tectonics theory，只是一个事实，可能理论之间有传承关系，也可能只是巧合。说derictly responsible肯定不对。
作者: pye348789 时间: 2012-6-11 06:47
那进一步请教：哪边可以证明A呢？
作者: yorku 时间: 2012-6-12 06:25
The origin of Continents and Oceans appears an impressive and prescient
(15) document, containing several of the essential presumptions underlying plate tectonics theory
一个旧时代得理论：impressive并且包含现今广泛承认得元素，A is ok
作者: newolder 时间: 2012-6-13 06:29
To most geologists today, Wegener’s The origin of Continents and Oceans appears an impressive and prescient
(15) document, containing several of the essential presumptions underlying plate tectonics theory
key:A
作者: tulip37 时间: 2012-6-13 21:39
同意楼上的。这个词很关键!
| 欢迎光临 国际顶尖MBA申请交流平台--TOPWAY MBA (http://forum.topway.org/) |
Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |